2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(02)00052-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete LU preconditioning for large scale dense complex linear systems from electromagnetic wave scattering problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This threshold is defined by the parameter drop-tolerance (drop-tol). ILU-based preconditioning techniques [6], [7] are widely used and become normally more efficient than the approximate inverse preconditioners (AIPC) [3], which are based on the more time-consuming minimization of the Frobenius-norm of the residual matrix I 0 ZP . Recently, Eibert [8] has proposed a preconditioning scheme that implicitly accounts for inv(M ) through an approximate iterative search of P nested in the GMRES-search of the solution.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold is defined by the parameter drop-tolerance (drop-tol). ILU-based preconditioning techniques [6], [7] are widely used and become normally more efficient than the approximate inverse preconditioners (AIPC) [3], which are based on the more time-consuming minimization of the Frobenius-norm of the residual matrix I 0 ZP . Recently, Eibert [8] has proposed a preconditioning scheme that implicitly accounts for inv(M ) through an approximate iterative search of P nested in the GMRES-search of the solution.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the simplicity of this approach there are enhancements that offer improved performance [36]. The Incomplete LU preconditioner, in turn, is another popular approach based on the approximate LU factorization of Z n and the use of those factors to perform the operation indicated in (3) [37]. A simple implementation of this preconditioner is denoted as ILU (0), in which the same sparsity pattern as [Z n ] is enforced.…”
Section: Solution Of the Mom Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression allows good parallelization properties of the SAI preconditioners, since given a number of computing nodes the parallelization process will consist on assigning small and independent LLS problems to each node and gather the results to assemble the preconditioning matrix [M ]. The ILU preconditioners are typically more difficult to parallelize due to the more sequential nature of the algorithm involved, although parallel implementation details can also be found in the literature [37]. For a given amount of memory (determined by the sparsity pattern) the ILU-based preconditioning approaches typically present faster convergence [40].…”
Section: Solution Of the Mom Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ill-conditioned EFIE matrices, however, ILUT (i.e., threshold-based ILU) with pivoting [19] is required to prevent the potential instability. Other successful adoptions of the ILU preconditioners are presented by Lee et al [20]. Despite the remarkable success of the ILU preconditioners, they are limited to sequential implementations due to difficulties in parallelizing their factorization algorithms and forward-backward solutions.…”
Section: Preconditioners Built From Near-field Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%