Incomplete Healing of the Uterine Incision after Cesarean Section: Is It Preventable by Intraoperative Digital Dilatation of the Internal Cervical Ostium?
Abstract:Background/Aims: It was the aim of this study to determine if intraoperative digital dilatation of the closed internal cervical ostium affects the healing of the uterine scar after a cesarean section (CS). Methods: In this randomized, prospective study, 94 term pregnant patients who elected to have a CS were assigned to two groups: intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium (group I, n = 48) or no dilatation (group II, n = 46). Vaginal ultrasound was used to check the integrity of the ce… Show more
“…We found 2 previous studies that recruited participants close to CD. 10,20 However, in those studies, the US examination was performed as early as 6e12 weeks after CD. We decided to perform the examinations 6 months after CD because it has been suggested that the cesarean woundhealing process will take at least 6 months.…”
Based on sonohysterographic examination, maternal body mass index, gestational diabetes, and previous cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk for incomplete healing of the uterine incision.
“…We found 2 previous studies that recruited participants close to CD. 10,20 However, in those studies, the US examination was performed as early as 6e12 weeks after CD. We decided to perform the examinations 6 months after CD because it has been suggested that the cesarean woundhealing process will take at least 6 months.…”
Based on sonohysterographic examination, maternal body mass index, gestational diabetes, and previous cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk for incomplete healing of the uterine incision.
“…We have done the examination 6 to 12 months after the CD; some other studies had performed earlier examination at 6 to 12 weeks after CD [17,18] . We preferred to do examination at this time because it was suggested that the healing process of cesarean wound takes at least 6 months [10] .…”
Objective: To assess the prevalence and investigate possible risk factors of cesarean scar niche after one cesarean delivery using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted on 250 non pregnant women attended to outpatient clinic in Mansoura university hospital. Patients with only one cesarean delivery done from 6 to 12 months prior to time of examination were evaluated by three-dimensional trans-vaginal ultrasonography to detect possible cesarean scar niche. The main outcome measure was the presence of cesarean scar niche. Women with cesarean scar niche were compared with those with intact scar (control group). Maternal demographic variables, obstetric and peri-operative variables were analyzed in both groups to detect possible risk factors of cesarean scar niche. Results: Cesarean scar niche was found in 77.2% of study group, with 58.4% of all study group having large defect. The most common shape of cesarean scar niche was triangular (71.6%). The following variables were more detected in cesarean scar defect group than in control group; advanced maternal BMI (as mean BMI in cesarean scar defect group was 27.15 ± 4.17 versus 25.28 ± 2.90 in control group; P value 0.001), presence of active labor (45,6% of women in cesarean scar defect group had active labor versus only 17.5% in the control group; P value ≤ 0.001), peripartum fever (34.2% of cesarean scar defect group had peripartum fever versus only 17.5% in the control group; P value 0.016), and uterine retroversion (uterus was retro flexed in 26.4% in the cesarean scar defect group versus only 12.3% in the control group; P value 0.016). Gestational age at time of delivery and fetal weight were not found to affect the risk of cesarean scar niche formation. Conclusion: Based on ultrasound examination, increased maternal BMI, presence of active labor, peripartum fever, and uterine retroversion were found to be associated with increased risk of cesarean scar niche. Reduced distance between cesarean section scar or niche and cervical internal os was associated with large defects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.