Incompetency training: Theory, practice, and remedies

Woodside, Arch G.

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.025

Cited by 30 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Degree of membership of observations in fuzzy sets is evaluated for each condition. Set membership scores are not probabilities (Woodside, 2012a). Independent and dependent measures are transformed into sets.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences on mutual fund performance: comparing US and Europe using qualitative comparative analysis

Graham

Navarré

Navarrete

2019

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the conditions that lead mutual funds to underperform or outperform competitors. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we draw upon extensive research on fund returns to affirm and extend earlier discoveries. Fund performance (Morningstar ratings), features of the funds themselves, and characteristics of the fund managers are considered. Positive Morningstar star and analyst ratings are necessary conditions for funds to generate value (measured by Jensen's alpha). Funds with low management fees and low ongoing fees have attractive Sharpe ratios and high returns. Likewise, large funds with good Morningstar ratings have good Sharpe ratios and returns, often when fund managers have short tenures.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences on mutual fund performance: comparing US and Europe using qualitative comparative analysis

Graham

Navarré

Navarrete

2019

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Researchers usually apply and report these symmetric tests routinely, automatically, without thought about the relevancy of complexity theory tenets in their theories or the usefulness of asymmetric algorithm tests (the second column in Table 2). For theory construction in B-to-B marketing contexts, regression analyses are applications of incompetency training (Woodside 2012;cf. Armstrong 2012;Gigerenzer and Brighton 2009;McClelland 1998;Ragin 1997Ragin , 2008aRagin , 2008b.…”

Section: Conclusion Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing Business-to-Business Marketing Models that Overcome the Limitations in Variable-Based and Case-Based Research Paradigms

Woodside

2015

Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This article describes the principal limitations frequently observable in variable-based and case-based research in business-to-business (B-to-B) marketing.Focus: The limitations relate to B-to-B theory construction, data collection, and data analysis and interpretation. The principal limitations in variable-based research include the reliance on regression (net effects) models in theory construction and the pervasive failure to test resulting empirical regression models for predictive validity. The principal limitations of case-based research are the frequent absence of rigorous theory formulation either pre-or postdata collection and failures to test propositions for predictive validity.Recommendations: The article directs attention to iconic studies that break free in part from these and additional limitations. The article offers useful steps on how to break free completely from the principal limitations.Managerial implications: B-to-B executives should insist that researchers include asymmetric algorithm models in reports that include symmetric (regression analysis) and analysis of variance findings.

show abstract

“…All the results are shown in Tables 8 and 9. In this paper, the consistency of all configurations is 1, meeting the standard of consistency that must be greater than 0.75 (Woodside, 2012;Ragin, 2014), stating that the results have good reliability.…”

Section: Consistency and Coveragementioning

confidence: 60%

Factors affecting transaction costs in megaprojects: a qualitative comparative analysis

Wang

2021

IJMPB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the factors influencing the transaction costs (TCs) in megaprojects to provide a basis for controlling project costs.Design/methodology/approachThis study selects six factors influencing the TCs in megaprojects from the perspective of TC theory and relational contract theory (RCT) through literature review. On the basis of crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), this study tests combined factors influencing the TCs and the interaction between them.FindingsResults show that in megaprojects, TCs are affected by combination factors. The combination of asset specificity, uncertainty, transaction frequency and trust and the combination of asset specificity, reputation and trust will control TCs in certain situations. In the configuration leading to high project TCs, the combination of environmental and behavioral uncertainties is a necessary condition.Originality/valueThis paper fills up the research gap in the field of megaproject TCs, and researchers can focus on this field in the future.

show abstract

Incompetency training: Theory, practice, and remedies

Cited by 30 publications

References 41 publications

Influences on mutual fund performance: comparing US and Europe using qualitative comparative analysis

Influences on mutual fund performance: comparing US and Europe using qualitative comparative analysis

Constructing Business-to-Business Marketing Models that Overcome the Limitations in Variable-Based and Case-Based Research Paradigms

Factors affecting transaction costs in megaprojects: a qualitative comparative analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About