2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-014-3685-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incompatible reaction for (3-4-epoxycyclohexane) methyl-3′-4′-epoxycyclohexyl-carboxylate (EEC) by calorimetric technology and theoretical kinetic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pure epoxy, there was a double-step process for thermally degrading in the air as shown in the black curve in Figure a. It is believed that the main loss with a maximum rate in the first stage is due to the decomposition of the epoxy network structure at 370 °C while leaving tiny amounts of char residue that is further degraded by thermal oxidation at around 420–540 °C in the second stage. , The thermal decomposition curves of epoxy-based composites were one step more than that of pure epoxy. It is attributed to the oxidative decomposition reaction of carbon fibers at around 540–900 °C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pure epoxy, there was a double-step process for thermally degrading in the air as shown in the black curve in Figure a. It is believed that the main loss with a maximum rate in the first stage is due to the decomposition of the epoxy network structure at 370 °C while leaving tiny amounts of char residue that is further degraded by thermal oxidation at around 420–540 °C in the second stage. , The thermal decomposition curves of epoxy-based composites were one step more than that of pure epoxy. It is attributed to the oxidative decomposition reaction of carbon fibers at around 540–900 °C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the calculation of the Málek model, the average E a of EEC and EEC under UV radiation with two durations of one and two months was 95.50, 57.13, and 72.14 kJ/mol, respectively. According to the open literature, E a of EEC in Málek model is similar to E a which was provided in the reference 35 . Moreover, the results of EEC under prominent UV at different durations of one and two months were the same as the trends of E a which were gained by the FWO, Friedman, and ASTM E698–5 models, and the E a of EEC under prominent UV radiation for one month was the lowest among all the other samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Figure 6 illustrates the calculation of E a through FWO model for EEC and EEC irradiated for one and two months with UV. From the literature review 34 , 35 , we determined that α of the main reaction in TG test was between 0.2–0.8. Therefore, the range of E a in the main reaction (α = 0.2 − 0.8) of EEC and EEC under different durations of UV at one and two months was 84.53–87.33, 53.06–59.34, and 74.93–77.59 kJ/mol, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TG is an effective technique for analyzing the mass loss of materials to obtain thermal stability parameters of various materials of interest [27][28][29]. Derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves were obtained by differentiating TG curves.…”
Section: Tg-dscmentioning
confidence: 99%