2017
DOI: 10.1002/malq.201500002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomparable ω1‐like models of set theory

Abstract: We show that the analogues of the embedding theorems of [3], proved for the countable models of set theory, do not hold when extended to the uncountable realm of ω 1 -like models of set theory. Specifically, under the hypothesis and suitable consistency assumptions, we show that there is a family of 2 ω 1 many ω 1 -like models of ZFC, all with the same ordinals, that are pairwise incomparable under embeddability; there can be a transitive ω 1 -like model of ZFC that does not embed into its own constructible un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A version of the split principle was first considered by Fuchs, Gitman, and Hamkins in the course of their work on [FGH17], the intended use being the construction of ultrafilters with certain properties. Later, the first author observed that the split principle is an "anti-large-cardinal axiom" which characterizes the failure of a regular cardinal to be weakly compact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A version of the split principle was first considered by Fuchs, Gitman, and Hamkins in the course of their work on [FGH17], the intended use being the construction of ultrafilters with certain properties. Later, the first author observed that the split principle is an "anti-large-cardinal axiom" which characterizes the failure of a regular cardinal to be weakly compact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%