2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.180413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incommensurate spin correlation driven by frustration inBiCu2PO6

Abstract: The magnetic properties of BiCu 2 PO 6 have been analyzed by means of magnetic-susceptibility and inelastic neutron-scattering measurements on powder samples by evaluating the spin-exchange interactions on the basis of density-functional calculations and by simulating the inelastic neutron scattering in terms of spin-exchange parameters. BiCu 2 PO 6 exhibits magnetic properties described by the two-leg spin ladder with strong spin frustration along each leg chain and has a gapped quantum singlet ground state w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In VASP, only the FLL and the related Dudarev's approach 53 to the DCC are available. According to previous studies, 54,55 we select U 3d = 7 eV and find a remarkable agreement with the FPLO FLL results at U 3d = 6 eV (see Table II). The 1 eV difference in U 3d is a typical offset due to the different basis sets (the Coulomb repulsion potential is applied to the atomic 3d orbitals which are basis-dependent).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Exchange Couplings A Lda-based Modelsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In VASP, only the FLL and the related Dudarev's approach 53 to the DCC are available. According to previous studies, 54,55 we select U 3d = 7 eV and find a remarkable agreement with the FPLO FLL results at U 3d = 6 eV (see Table II). The 1 eV difference in U 3d is a typical offset due to the different basis sets (the Coulomb repulsion potential is applied to the atomic 3d orbitals which are basis-dependent).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Exchange Couplings A Lda-based Modelsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Another relevant example is BiCu 2 PO 6 with its rungs of the spin ladder running between the structural ribbons. 54,59 Such intricate implementation of the longrange superexchange couplings is an abundant well of surprises, as in the present study. β-Cu 2 V 2 O 7 reveals a spin-1 2 honeycomb lattice, despite lacking any apparent structural features of the honeycomb geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the gap energy differs significantly from the value of ∆ ∼ 2.9 meV reported by previous thermodynamic measurements. 20,21,23 This discrepancy is potentially resolved by the presence of strong anisotropic interactions neglected in the thermodynamic analysis. Indeed, DM anisotropies are permitted by the crystallographic symmetries of BiCu 2 PO 6 .…”
Section: (Dmrg) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,[22][23][24] The thermodynamic measurements cannot be interpreted in terms of simple gapped one-dimensional (1D) models, including the J 1 -J 2 chain and the two-leg ladder, but require a combination of frustration and two-leg- ladder geometry. 21,24 Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements on powder samples have reported that BiCu 2 PO 6 has a dispersive spin excitation spectrum with a gap of ∆ = 2.9 meV and that significant frustration is required to describe the powder averaged structure factor. 21 More recent high field magnetization measurements on single crystals have revealed that the critical field for the closing of the spin gap is dependent on the direction of the applied field indicative of strong anisotropic interactions in the magnetic Hamiltonian.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic susceptibility and heat capacity measurement on polycrystalline samples showing existence of a $ 34 K spin-gap were analyzed to imply leg-coupling J 1 /k B ¼80 K and leg to rung exchange ratio J 1 =J 2 $ 1 [11]. Furthermore, there might be frustrated coupling between adjacent rungs, which could add interesting new aspects to the spin ladder physics [12]. A schematic diagram of the structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%