2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income, wealth and economic inequality in Australia

Abstract: Economic well-being and economic inequality are usually quantified using income measurements of various sorts.Such analyses overlook the contribution of wealtha potentially very significant factor. In this article, we inte-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier study, we analysed the combined effect of income and wealth on economic inequality in Australia (Tapper and Fenna, 2018). The present study is an attempt to take that one step further, incorporating the age variable, using ABS data for 2009-10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier study, we analysed the combined effect of income and wealth on economic inequality in Australia (Tapper and Fenna, 2018). The present study is an attempt to take that one step further, incorporating the age variable, using ABS data for 2009-10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICT growth may exacerbate inequality due to differential access and skill premiums [ 18 ]. Economic well-being and economic inequality are usually quantified using income measurements of various sorts [ 19 ]. The growing labor market inequality and rising intergenerational divides amplifying the importance of parental resources [ 20 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we controlled for gender, age and income in allanalyses. Because income and education are typically highly correlated, our preregistered analyses did not include both factors in statistical models in order to reduce collinearity46 .Altruists and controls did not differ significantly in relationship type (i.e., spouse, friend, roommate, etc. ; see FigureS1in the SI) across nominations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%