2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-013-9302-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income tax buyouts and income tax evasion

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to Alm & Jackson (1992), a number of studies such as Yaniv (2013), Boryana (2011), Goerke (2015) and Bayer (2006) supported a positive relationship between tax rates and tax evasion. Similarly, examining tax evasion in China based on imports from Hong Kong, Fisman & Wei (2004) find that a 1% increase in the tax rate results in a 3% increase in evasion.…”
Section: Impact Of Tax Rates On Tax Evasionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Contrary to Alm & Jackson (1992), a number of studies such as Yaniv (2013), Boryana (2011), Goerke (2015) and Bayer (2006) supported a positive relationship between tax rates and tax evasion. Similarly, examining tax evasion in China based on imports from Hong Kong, Fisman & Wei (2004) find that a 1% increase in the tax rate results in a 3% increase in evasion.…”
Section: Impact Of Tax Rates On Tax Evasionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…An exception to the persistence of the decision for tax aversion appears to the case according to which this decision is made aiming at earning the money needed to pay to the tax authority some fixed price for the reduction of the marginal tax rate; it is the case of the so called "tax buyouts", (Goerke 2015). Also, judging from the work of Strulik (2010) about anticipated tax reforms and temporary tax cuts, tax aversion might prove to be temporary in this case, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We connect to a literature on the use by tax authorities of pre-audit settlements in which taxpayers can acquire full (e.g., Chu, 1990;Glen Ueng and Yang, 2001) or partial (Goerke, 2015) insurance from audit risk. These settlements are shown to yield a Pareto improvement relative to random auditing as 6 Within eight months of the G20 summit of April 2009 tax havens had signed more than 300 treaties (Johannesen and Zucman, 2014).…”
Section: O¤shore Disclosure Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%