2017
DOI: 10.1177/0007650317697954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income Inequality, Entrepreneurial Activity, and National Business Systems: A Configurational Analysis

Abstract: This article explores how and why high levels of income inequality result from configurations of different types of entrepreneurial activities and elements of the institutional context in a multicountry sample. A configurational approach is used to unpack the complexities associated with how income inequality arises from different types of entrepreneurial activities embedded in different institutional contexts associated with Whitley's national business systems dimensions. The findings from fuzzy-set qualitati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She concludes that high-growth and/or economic activity are not sufficient to prevent income inequality; rather in some cases, they exacerbate the widening income gap between different societal actors. Specifically, Lewellyn (2018) shows that high income inequality is likely to result from high-growth entrepreneurship when such entrepreneurship occurs in institutional contexts with capital-based financial systems, and in contexts that promote reductions in wages. These findings illustrate how high-growth entrepreneurship characterized by the presence of large corporations increases income inequality when it follows the principle of shareholder wealth maximization-reflected in capital-based financial systems and a reduction in wages to employees.…”
Section: The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…She concludes that high-growth and/or economic activity are not sufficient to prevent income inequality; rather in some cases, they exacerbate the widening income gap between different societal actors. Specifically, Lewellyn (2018) shows that high income inequality is likely to result from high-growth entrepreneurship when such entrepreneurship occurs in institutional contexts with capital-based financial systems, and in contexts that promote reductions in wages. These findings illustrate how high-growth entrepreneurship characterized by the presence of large corporations increases income inequality when it follows the principle of shareholder wealth maximization-reflected in capital-based financial systems and a reduction in wages to employees.…”
Section: The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It differs in terms of entrepreneurial activity and in socioeconomic status such as income level, education, or occupation-two highly interrelated factors (e.g., Armington & Acs, 2002). For instance, entrepreneurship can act as a catalyzer reducing regional wealth disparity by creating new jobs or increasing consumption (Cumming et al, 2020a;Moulick et al, 2019), yet it may also act as factor further widening the gap between rich and poor by decreasing affordability or heightening income inequality (Lewellyn, 2018;Singer, 2006). Thanks to its universal approach, crowdfunding addresses both factors.…”
Section: Objective Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this idea, Halvarsson et al [13] find evidence for the contribution of self-employment to income dispersion using microdata from Sweden. Lewellyn [14] analyzes the complex relationship between income inequality and entrepreneurial activity from a systemic perspective using qualitative techniques. Atems and Shand [15] investigate if entrepreneurship impacts inequality, finding empirical evidence of a positive correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%