2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income inequality and the tax structure: Evidence from developed and developing countries

Abstract: This paper seeks to examine the effect of income inequality on the structure of tax policies. We first use a simplified theoretical framework which allows us to formalize the testable implications of the relevant literature. Subsequently, our analysis indicates that more unequal economies rely heavier on capital relative to labor income taxation. This relationship remains robust across various alternative measures of income inequality and most importantly through alternative political regimes. In addition, our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while Adam et al (2015) verify that, for a 75 sample of both developed and developing countries, high-income inequality countries rely more on capital taxes and, consequently, hamper both investment and economic growth, Pestel and Sommer (2016) assess the effect for changing from labour income taxes to consumption over labour supply and distribution effects for the German case. The authors agree that the above-mentioned tax shift results in a regressive impact in short-run labour supply.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while Adam et al (2015) verify that, for a 75 sample of both developed and developing countries, high-income inequality countries rely more on capital taxes and, consequently, hamper both investment and economic growth, Pestel and Sommer (2016) assess the effect for changing from labour income taxes to consumption over labour supply and distribution effects for the German case. The authors agree that the above-mentioned tax shift results in a regressive impact in short-run labour supply.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widespread usage, the HDI has come under criticism relating to many points, including neglecting inequality and environmental measures, methodological flaws, for failing to portray within-country variability, for the seemingly arbitrary choice of indices and for being overly simplistic and idealised (Hou, Walsh, & Zhang, 2015;Ivanova, 1994;Sagar & Najam, 1998;Stewart, Ranis, & Samman, 2006). Despite these criticisms, it still provides a useful yardstick by which to gauge the human development of a country relative to others, even though within-country variability is not accounted for (e.g., intra-country inequity in income, living standards, health, etc., e.g., Adam, Kammas, & Lapatinas, 2015;Blum, 2013).…”
Section: Global Development and The Un Human Development Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline specification that we use in order to study the relationship between the political regime and tax rates on labor and capital is based on the relationship used by Adam et al (2015):…”
Section: Basic Econometric Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%