2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10644-015-9169-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income convergence in India: a nonparametric approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar and Subramanian (2012) find divergence or rising inequality among the Indian states. Sofi and Durai (2016) find absolute divergence and conditional convergence among the 22 Indian states from 1980–1981 to 2010–2011. The study made by Sanga and Shaban (2017) on 15 major Indian states finds divergence of the economy at the aggregate level.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kumar and Subramanian (2012) find divergence or rising inequality among the Indian states. Sofi and Durai (2016) find absolute divergence and conditional convergence among the 22 Indian states from 1980–1981 to 2010–2011. The study made by Sanga and Shaban (2017) on 15 major Indian states finds divergence of the economy at the aggregate level.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the Indian context, the imbalanced economic performance among the regions has also attracted substantial interest among researchers, policymakers and planners. As a result, several empirical studies on the convergence among Indian states/regions have been conducted (see e.g., Cashin and Sahay, 1996; Marjit and Mitra, 1996; Bajpai and Sachs, 1996; Ghosh et al , 1998; Rao et al , 1999; Nagaraj et al , 2000; Dasgupta et al , 2000; Aiyar, 2001; Sachs et al , 2002; Singh et al , 2003; Adabar, 2004; Bhattacharya and Sakthivel, 2004; Kar, and Sakthivel, 2006; Kar and Sakthivel, 2007; Nayyar, 2008; Ghosh, 2008; Das et al , 2010; Chikte, 2011; Sahoo, 2012; Kumar and Subramanian, 2012; Ghosh et al , 2013; Mallick, 2014; Cherodian and Thirlwall, 2015; Sofi and Durai, 2016; Sanga and Shaban, 2017; Chakraborty and Chakraborty, 2018; Mishra and Mishra, 2018; Hembram et al , 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2020). Based on different samples of the states/regions over different periods, these studies give mixed results on the convergence of the Indian states/regions.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methodological developments necessitate estimating the growth regressions considering spatial interactions. 3 For further explanations refer Quah (1993Quah ( , 1996aQuah ( , 1996bQuah ( , 1997; Galor (1996); Magrini (2009); Sofi and Durai (2016) among others. 4 Even the quantitative information obtained through Quah's (1993Quah's ( , 1996aQuah's ( , 1996b Twin Peaks hypothesis represents only one peak which cannot truly reflect the full information of convergence clubs.…”
Section: Ethics Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For further explanations refer Quah (1993, 1996a, 1996b, 1997); Galor (1996); Magrini (2009); Sofi and Durai (2016) among others. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to emergence of literature that examines the convergence with the help of advanced econometric methodologies[1] (Friedman, 1992; Quah, 1993a, b, 1997). More recently Sofi and Durai (2016) provide a comprehensive examination on the distributional aspect of income convergence among Indian states and highlight the methodological issues in estimating the convergence hypothesis. The study demonstrates that there are significant signs of club convergence among the states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%