2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.86.035502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incoherent neutrinoproduction of photons and pions in a chiral effective field theory for nuclei

Abstract: We study the incoherent neutrinoproduction of photons and pions with neutrino energy E ν 0.5 GeV. These processes are relevant to the background analysis in neutrino-oscillation experi- Rev. Lett. 100, 032301 (2008)]. The calculations are carried out using a Lorentz-covariant effective field theory (EFT) which contains nucleons, pions, the Delta (1232) (∆s), isoscalar scalar (σ) and vector (ω) fields, and isovector vector (ρ) fields, and has SU(2) L ⊗ SU(2) R chiral symmetry realized nonlinearly. The contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(157 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used m ω = (782.65± 0.12) MeV. The expression (15) holds for all a 1 charge states. The branching fractions in Table II are quite small because of the large a 1 total width.…”
Section: Rates Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have used m ω = (782.65± 0.12) MeV. The expression (15) holds for all a 1 charge states. The branching fractions in Table II are quite small because of the large a 1 total width.…”
Section: Rates Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strengthens the conclusions of Refs. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][17][18][19] that if the MiniBooNE signal is indeed found to be photons, the WZW anomaly is unlikely to be their dominant source.…”
Section: New Interaction and Miniboonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed a theoretical calculation by Fogli and Nardulli [55,56] in an effective Lagrangian field theoretical model has shown that the inclusion of pion pole, nucleon pole, and other I = 1 2 resonance contribution leads to a better explanation of ANL [28], BNL [29] and CERN [57][58][59] data. In recent times, the need for inclusion of non-resonant and resonant (I = 1 2 channel) background terms to the dominant ∆(1232) contributions to explain the neutrino induced single pion production has been emphasized by many authors [53,[60][61][62][63] and numerical calculations have been performed to explain the present data. These calculations have been done either phenomenologically [61][62][63] or in an effective Lagrangian field theoretical model [53,60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, the need for inclusion of non-resonant and resonant (I = 1 2 channel) background terms to the dominant ∆(1232) contributions to explain the neutrino induced single pion production has been emphasized by many authors [53,[60][61][62][63] and numerical calculations have been performed to explain the present data. These calculations have been done either phenomenologically [61][62][63] or in an effective Lagrangian field theoretical model [53,60]. However, there is no consensus on the treatment of background terms whether they should be added coherently or incoherently to the dominant ∆(1232) contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%