Incoherent Inputs Enhance the Robustness of Biological Oscillators

Abstract

SUMMARY Robust biological oscillators retain the critical ability to function in the presence of environmental perturbations. Although central architectures that support robust oscillations have been extensively studied, networks containing the same core vary drastically in their potential to oscillate, and it remains elusive what peripheral modifications to the core contribute to this functional variation. Here, we have generated a complete atlas of two- and three-node oscillators computationally, then systematically analyzed the association between network structure and robustness. We found that, while certain core topologies are essential for producing a robust oscillator, local structures can substantially modulate the robustness of oscillations. Notably, local nodes receiving incoherent or coherent inputs respectively promote or attenuate the overall network robustness in an additive manner. We validated these relationships in larger-scale networks reflective of real biological oscillators. Our findings provide an explanation for why auxiliary structures not required for oscillation are evolutionarily conserved and suggest simple ways to evolve or design robust oscillators.

FRET-Based Sorting of Live Cells Reveals Shifted Balance between PLK1 and CDK1 Activities During Checkpoint Recovery

“…The oscillation of protein levels and activities caused by feedback and feedforward systems constitutes a challenge when the cell cycle needs to be paused; it is not easy to freeze a complex free-running self-sustained oscillator [9]. Even if the oscillation is stopped, the system is likely to keep changing towards a new steady state.…”

Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells

“…An interesting next step in bottom‐up synthetic biology is to reconstruct a cell cycle completely from scratch. Computational studies have shown that even with complicated biological clock networks, a minimal core architecture is sufficient for self‐sustained oscillations, while those evolutionary‐conserved peripheral network structures may provide additional modifications to promote functions such as robustness (Z. Li, Liu, & Yang, 2017) and tunability (Tsai et al, 2008). Indeed, a landmark study has successfully reconstituted a temperature‐compensated bacterial circadian clock in a test tube with components as simple as three Kai proteins and ATP (Nakajima et al, 2005), exemplifying a minimal design of a circadian clock.…”

A generic systems-theoretic approach to identify biological networks capable of adaptation

“…Besides adaptation, several studies have focused on understanding the emergence of functionalities such as oscillation, toggle switches, and determining the underlying circuitry [13][14][15][16], employing methods ranging from brute force searches [16] and rulebased modelling [13] to control-theoretic approaches [15]. Tyson et al (1974) conceived a two-protein negative feedback model with specific rate kinetics to prove the existence of an invariant Poincaré-Bendixson annulus which can lead to oscillation [13].…”