2012
DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2012.739172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive spaces in Integrated River Basin Management: discerning multiple boundaries of resource relations

Abstract: The existence of multilayered boundaries and networks in a river basin redefines the river basin geographies and concepts and poses extreme challenges to centralized notions of Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM). The paper traces various boundaries that exist due to the physical peculiarities, political situations, resource transfer scenarios and socio-economic networks in one of the most exploited river basins in the highly populated biodiversity hotspot of the Southern Western Ghats in India and analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fragmented, or missing collaborative policy-making frameworks were identified as governance challenges in 144 papers (60%). Such fragmentation was cited to be the result of a wide variety of factors, such as the hybridisation of governance structures (T. H. , divergent stakeholder interests (Hovik et al, 2010), and boundary disparities (Sreeja et al, 2012). T. H. for example, reiterated the 'ever-increasing array of government and non-government actors at multiple scales' as a major factor contributing to the complexity of natural resource management governance systems in Australia, and the degree to which they included collaborative policy-making frameworks.…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmented, or missing collaborative policy-making frameworks were identified as governance challenges in 144 papers (60%). Such fragmentation was cited to be the result of a wide variety of factors, such as the hybridisation of governance structures (T. H. , divergent stakeholder interests (Hovik et al, 2010), and boundary disparities (Sreeja et al, 2012). T. H. for example, reiterated the 'ever-increasing array of government and non-government actors at multiple scales' as a major factor contributing to the complexity of natural resource management governance systems in Australia, and the degree to which they included collaborative policy-making frameworks.…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River basin based NR governance being institutionalized in many countries of the South is rooted in the principle of subsidiarity whereby resource management actions are taken at the lowest appropriate level (Molle, 2009;World Bank, 2004). The reconstitution of natural resource use in diversified livelihood landscapes of river basins links the local spaces of NR governance across multiple scales and institutional levels through resource and livelihood networks (Adger et al, 2005;Cleaver and Franks, 2005;Sreeja et al, 2012;Venot et al, 2011). Distinct interest group networks are formed in the wake of these new resource configurations that play a huge role in stakeholder based co-management of resources.…”
Section: Transition Landscapes and Implications For Natural Resource mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India has extensive alluvial, soft rock and coastal regions where transboundary aquifer systems predominate and therefore the boundary-related uncertainties can be substantial. Aggregation of administrative blocks into basins also brings in the additional scale problems of administrative and basin boundary mismatches (Sreeja et al 2012). Hence, the total water availability assessed in any river basin is subject to these scale-dependent uncertainties.…”
Section: Water Resources Of India and Uncertainties In Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%