1988
DOI: 10.2172/5188194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive. pi. /sup + -/, K/sup + -/, and p, anti p production in e/sup +/e/sup -/ annihilation at. sqrt. s = 29 GeV

Abstract: and a dE/dx resolution of typically 3.5% allow the measurements to be extended to higher z than previously reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with research reviewed earlier (Cowan et al, 1993;Lytton & Romney, 1991;Youniss & Smollar, 1985), we found few differences between daughters and sons for the influence of mothers. Whereas mothers significantly affected their sons but not their daughters by promoting prosocial beliefs (and subsequently, behavior), mothers' effects on beliefs were of roughly the same order of magnitude for their daughters and sons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with research reviewed earlier (Cowan et al, 1993;Lytton & Romney, 1991;Youniss & Smollar, 1985), we found few differences between daughters and sons for the influence of mothers. Whereas mothers significantly affected their sons but not their daughters by promoting prosocial beliefs (and subsequently, behavior), mothers' effects on beliefs were of roughly the same order of magnitude for their daughters and sons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Youniss and Smollar describe the father-daughter relationship as a ''nonrelation' ' (p. 51). Other studies appear to concur that the differential socialization of daughters and sons occurs primarily with fathers (Cowan et al, 1993;Lytton & Romney, 1991).…”
Section: Differential Influence On Daughters and Sonsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Phenotype characterization of RJ2. In previous reports, HLA class I-transfected L cells were sufficient for stimulation of some alloreactive Tcell clones [37], but not others [38], depending apparently on the fine specificity of the clones and their sensitivity to the cellular background on which the allogeneic molecules are expressed In conclusion, the capacity to stimulate Tcell alloresponses was not a simple function of class I1 density, expression of known accessory molecules or invariant chain, the ability to process antigens or the presence of human peptides. One must, therefore, assume that the additional requirement is either for further, undefined, accessory molecules or specific cytokines [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Alloreactivity, manifested clinically as graft rejection or GVH disease, represents the cross-reactive recognition of non-self MHC products by a TcR which is specific for In previous reports, HLA class I-transfected L cells were sufficient for stimulation of some alloreactive Tcell clones [37], but not others [38], depending apparently on the fine specificity of the clones and their sensitivity to the cellular background on which the allogeneic molecules are expressed [39]. Our own studies have shown that HLA class 11-transfected L cells stimulated MLR-like responses in PBMC, provided that sufficiently high class I1 expression is achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of Tax protein to induce cell growth and influence transcription regulation is consistent with its role as an extracellular cytokine. In addition, treatment of extracellular Tax protein results in the induction of TNFa gene expression in human neuronal cells (53). Such Tax protein-induced lymphocyte proliferation is also associated with activation of endogenous IL-2R a-chain expression (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%