Inclusive dijet cross sections in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Abramowicz, H.; Abt, I.; Adamczyk, L.; Adamus, M.; Aggarwal, R.; Antonelli, S.; Antonioli, P.; Антонов, А.; Arneodo, M.; Aushev, V.; Aushev, Y.; Bachynska, O.; Bamberger, A.; Barakbaev, A. N.; Barbagli, G.; Bari, G.; Barreiro, F.; Bartsch, D.; Basile, M.; Behnke, O.; Behr, J.; Behrens, U.; Bellagamba, L.; Bertolin, A.; Bhadra, S.; Bindi, M.; Blohm, C.; Bokhonov, V.; Bołd, T.; Boos, E.; Borras, K.; Boscherini, D.; Bot, D.; Boutle, S.; Brock, I.; Brownson, E.; Brugnera, R.; Brümmer, N.; Bruni, A.; Bruni, G.; Brzozowska, B.; Bussey, P.; Butterworth, J. M.; Bylsma, B.; Caldwell, A.; Capua, M.; Carlin, R.; Catterall, C. D.; Chekanov, S.; Chwastowski, J. J.; Ciborowski, J.; Ciesielski, R.; Cifarelli, L.; Cindolo, F.; Contin, A.; Cooper-Sarkar, A. M.; Coppola, N.; Corradi, M.; Corriveau, F.; Costa, M.; D’Agostini, G.; Corso, F. Dal; Peso, J. Del; Dementiev, R. K.; Pasquale, S. De; Derrick, M.; Devenish, R. C. E.; Dobur, D.; Dolgoshein, B. A.; Dolinska, G.; Doyle, A. T.; Drugakov, V.; Durkin, L. S.; Dusini, S.; Eisenberg, Y.; Ermolov, P.; Eskreys, A.; Fang, S. S.; Fazio, S.; Ferrando, J.; Ferrero, M. I.; Figiel, J.; Forrest, M.; Foster, B.; Fourletov, S.; Gach, G. P.; Galas, A.; Gallo, E.; Garfagnini, A.; Geiser, A.; Gialas, I.; Gladilin, L. K.; Gladkov, D.; Glasman, C.; Gogota, O.; Golubkov, Yu. A.; Göttlicher, P.; Grabowska-Bołd, I.; Grebenyuk, J.; Gregor, I. M.; Grigorescu, G.; Grzelak, G.; Gueta, O.; Gwenlan, C.; Haas, T.; Hain, W.; Hamatsu, R.; Hart, J. C.; Hartmann, H.; Hartner, G.; Hilger, E.; Hochman, D.; Hori, R.; Horton, K.; Hüttmann, A.; Iacobucci, G.; Ibrahim, Zainol Abidin; Iga, Y.; Ingbir, R.; Ishitsuka, M.; Jakob, H.‐P.; Januschek, F.; Jiménez, M.; Jones, T. W.; Jüngst, M.; Каденко, І.; Kahle, B.; Kamaluddin, B.; Kananov, S.; Kanno, T.; Karshon, U.; Karstens, F.; Katkov, I.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, P.; Keramidas, A.; Khein, Lev; Kim, J. Y.; Kisielewska, D.; Kitamura, S.; Klanner, R.; Klein, U.; Koffeman, E.; Kooijman, P.; Korol, Ie.; Korzhavina, I. A.; Kotański, A.; Kötz, U.; Kowalski, H.; Kulinski, P.; Kuprash, O.; Kuze, M.; Lee, A.; Levchenko, B. B.; Levy, A.; Libov, V.; Limentani, S.; Ling, T. Y.; Lisovyi, M.; Lobodzinska, E.; Lohmann, W.; Löhr, B.; Lohrmann, E.; Loizides, J. H.; Long, K.; Longhin, A.; Lontkovskyi, D.; Lukina, O. Yu.; Łużniak, P.; Maeda, J.; Magill, S.; Makarenko, I.; Malka, J.; Mankel, R.; Margotti, A.; Marini, G.; Martin, J. F.; Mastroberardino, A.; Mattingly, M.C.K.; Melzer-Pellmann, I.-A.; Miglioranzi, S.; Idris, F. Mohamad; Monaco, V.; Montanari, A.; Morris, J. D.; Mujkic, K.; Musgrave, B.; Nagano, K.; Namsoo, T.; Nania, R.; Nicholass, D.; Nigro, A.; Ye, Ning; Noor, U.; Notz, D.; Nowak, R. J.; Nuncio-Quiroz, A. E.; Oh, B.Y.; Okazaki, N.; Oliver, K.; Olkiewicz, K.; Onishchuk, Y.; Papageorgiu, K.; Parenti, A.; Paul, E.; Pawlak, J. M.; Pawlik, B.; Pelfer, P. G.; Pellegrino, A.; Perlański, W.; Perrey, H.; Piotrzkowski, K.; Pluciński, P.; Pokrovskiy, N. S.; Polini, A.; Proskuryakov, A.S.; Przybycień, M.; Raval, A.; Reeder, D.; Reisert, B.; Ren, Z.; Repond, J.; Ri, Y.D.; Robertson, A. I.; Roloff, Philipp; Ron, E.; Rubinsky, I.; Ruspa, M.; Sacchi, R.; Salii, A.; Samson, U.; Sartorelli, G.; Savin, A.A.; Saxon, D. H.; Schioppa, M.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schleper, P.; Schmidke, W. B.; Schneekloth, U.; Schönberg, V.; Schörner-Sadenius, T.; Schwartz, J.; Sciulli, F.; Shcheglova, L.M.; Shehzadi, R.; Shimizu, S.; Singh, Inderpal; Skillicorn, I. O.; Słomiński, W.; Smith, W. H.; Sola, V.; Solano, A.; Son, D.; Sosnovtsev, V.; Спиридонов, А.; Stadie, H.; Stančo, L.; Stern, A.; Stewart, T. P.; Stifutkin, A.; Stopa, P.; Suchkov, S.; Susinno, G.; Suszycki, L.; Sztuk-Dambietz, J.; Szuba, D.; Szuba, J.; Tapper, A.; Tassi, E.; Terrón, J.; Theedt, T.; Tiecke, H.; Tokushuku, K.; Tomalak, Oleksandr; Tomaszewska, J.; Tsurugai, T.; Turcato, M.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uribe-Estrada, C.; Vázquez, M.; Verbytskyi, A.; Viazlo, O.; Vlasov, N.; Volynets, O.; Walczak, R.; Abdullah, Wan Ahmad Tajuddin Wan; Whitmore, J. J.; Whyte, J.; Wiggers, L.; Wing, M.; Wlasenko, M.; Wolf, G.; Wolfe, H.; Wrona, K.; Yagües-Molina, A. G.; Yamada, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Youngman, C.; Żarnecki, A. F.; Zawiejski, L.; Zenaiev, O.; Zeuner, Wolfram Dietrich; Zhautykov, B.O.; Zhmak, N.; Zhou, C.; Zichichi, A.; Zolko, M.; Zotkin, D.S.; Zulkapli, Z.

doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1504-2

Cited by 27 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Small differences of the correction factors between RAPGAP and DJANGOH , which both use the Lund string fragmentation model, are observed, due to the different modelling of the partonic final state. The values of c had range from 0.8 to 1 and are given in the jet cross sections Tables 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 and 25. Table 19 Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q 2 and P T 3 using the k T jet algorithm.…”

Section: Hadronisation Correctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1d) of O(α 2 s ). Recent publications by the ZEUS collaboration concerning jet production in DIS dealt with cross sections of dijet [8] and inclusive jet production [9], whereas recent H1 publica- The predictions from DJANGOH and RAPGAP are weighted to achieve good agreement with the data. The ratio of data to prediction is shown at the bottom of each figure tions dealt with multijet production and the determination of the strong coupling constant α s (M Z ) at low Q 2 [10] and at high Q 2 [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measurement of multijet production in $${e\!\!\;p}$$ e p collisions at high $$\varvec{Q^2}$$ Q 2 and determination of the strong coupling $$\varvec{{\alpha _s}} $$ α s

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inclusive jet, dijet and trijet differential cross sections are measured in neutral current deep-inelastic scattering for exchanged boson virtualities 150 < Q 2 < 15 000 GeV 2 using the H1 detector at HERA. The data were taken in the years 2003 to 2007 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 351 pb −1 . Double differential jet cross sections are obtained using a regularised unfolding procedure. They are presented as a function of Q 2 and the transverse momentum of the jet, P

show abstract

Section: Hadronisation Correctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of multijet production in $${e\!\!\;p}$$ e p collisions at high $$\varvec{Q^2}$$ Q 2 and determination of the strong coupling $$\varvec{{\alpha _s}} $$ α s

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dijet final states have been measured to high precision over a large kinematical range by the H1 [4][5][6] and ZEUS [7,8] experiments, which have also used these measurements in the determination of the strong coupling constant. The reconstruction of jets is performed in the Breit frame, defined by the direction of the virtual photon and incoming proton, while the jet rapidity coverage is limited by the detector's geometry in the laboratory frame.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Precise QCD Predictions for the Production of Dijet Final States in Deep Inelastic Scattering

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(2016) 'Precise QCD predictions for the production of dijet nal states in deep inelastic scattering.', Physical review letters., 117 (4). 042001.Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.042001Publisher's copyright statement:Reprinted with permission from the American Physical Society: Currie, James and Gehrmann, Thomas and Niehues, Jan (2016) 'Precise QCD predictions for the production of dijet nal states in deep inelastic scattering.', Physical review letters., 117 (4). 042001 c 2016 by the American Physical Society. Readers may view, browse, and/or download material for temporary copying purposes only, provided these uses are for noncommercial personal purposes. Except as provided by law, this material may not be further reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modi ed, adapted, performed, displayed, published, or sold in whole or part, without prior written permission from the American Physical Society.Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

“…The function on the left hand side of (2.4) contains poles in ε up to order 2(m + l − 2). Combining these functions with the mass factorisation kernels from the PDFs, one can define J l operators [24] that match the Catani pole structure 6) where I l is the Catani operator [25]. Integrated subtraction terms are then used to construct part of the subtractions terms at lower partonic multiplicities (added back in with opposite sign), enabling explicit pole cancellation against poles of virtual matrix elements, so that the Antenna Subtraction amounts to adding a "clever" zero overall.…”

Section: Antenna Subtractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A large number of dijet events were recorded by the two HERA experiments, H1 [2,3,4] and ZEUS [5,6], at DESY. At leading order in pertubation theory, dijet production is described by the basic scattering processes γ * q → qg and γ * g → qq [7] and provides a direct measurement of parton distribution functions (PDFs) [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

NNLO dijet production in DIS with the antenna subtraction method

Niehues¹,

Currie²,

Gehrmann³

2016

Proceedings of Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory — PoS(LL2016)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present the first computation of two-jet production in deep inelastic scattering at NNLO, fully differential in the kinematic variables. The computation is carried out using the Antenna Subtraction formalism to handle infrared divergences. Aspects of the subtraction method are discussed. Our results ware compared to a recent analyses by the H1 collaboration in the high Q 2 region. Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory

show abstract

Inclusive dijet cross sections in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Cited by 27 publications

References 87 publications

Measurement of multijet production in $${e\!\!\;p}$$ e p collisions at high $$\varvec{Q^2}$$ Q 2 and determination of the strong coupling $$\varvec{{\alpha _s}} $$ α s

Measurement of multijet production in $${e\!\!\;p}$$ e p collisions at high $$\varvec{Q^2}$$ Q 2 and determination of the strong coupling $$\varvec{{\alpha _s}} $$ α s

Precise QCD Predictions for the Production of Dijet Final States in Deep Inelastic Scattering

NNLO dijet production in DIS with the antenna subtraction method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About