2007
DOI: 10.1177/1077727x07299675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive Design in Apparel Product Development for Working Women With Physical Disabilities

Abstract: Consumers with physical limitations want apparel products and retail environments that work for them. Inclusive design is a framework for developing products to satisfy multiple consumers, regardless of their physical ability. This qualitative study reports on physical limitations and apparel preferences of working women (n = 9) with a variety of limitations. A prototype for a garment was developed, wear‐tested, and evaluated using inclusive design criteria. Subsequently, manufacturers (n = 6) were interviewed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, clothing might need to be modified to allow access to IV ports or catheters necessitated by impairments in body function, or might interfere with the ability to use assistive devices and thus a person's ability to execute different activities (Banks 2001;Garner and Douglas 1991;Nessley and King 1980;Wang et al 2014;White and Dallas 1977). Further, clothing can increase feelings of stigma that influence the desire or ability to engage in social participation (Carroll and Gross 2010;Carroll and Kincade 2007;Freeman, Kaiser, and Wingate 1985;Wingate, Kaiser, and Freeman 1986). For many PLWD, "…dressing in patient clothing can be a metaphor for illness or other health problems" (Topo andIltanen-Tähkävuori 2010, 1685).…”
Section: Disability Assessment and Impacts On Social Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, clothing might need to be modified to allow access to IV ports or catheters necessitated by impairments in body function, or might interfere with the ability to use assistive devices and thus a person's ability to execute different activities (Banks 2001;Garner and Douglas 1991;Nessley and King 1980;Wang et al 2014;White and Dallas 1977). Further, clothing can increase feelings of stigma that influence the desire or ability to engage in social participation (Carroll and Gross 2010;Carroll and Kincade 2007;Freeman, Kaiser, and Wingate 1985;Wingate, Kaiser, and Freeman 1986). For many PLWD, "…dressing in patient clothing can be a metaphor for illness or other health problems" (Topo andIltanen-Tähkävuori 2010, 1685).…”
Section: Disability Assessment and Impacts On Social Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a set of sequential activities and tasks that reflect the customer needs in product planning (Suh, Carroll & Cassill, 2010). Models describing the process of garment product development are briefly explained through five stages: idea generation, design, prototyping, evaluation and design refinement, and production planning (Watkins, 1988;Gaskill, 1992;Lamb & Kallal, 1992;Wickett, Gaskill, & Damhorst, 1999;Carroll & Kincade, 2007) as shown in Figure 1. Research into the product development process is intended to increase the effectiveness of product development and reliability of their actions and decisions (Regan, Kincade, & Sheldon, 1998 Steps for the development of the collection engineers and all professionals must make several decisions taking into account diverse criteria.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria In Clothing Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carroll and Kincade (2007) proposed a five-stage product development model involving (a) the collection of consumer needs and preferences from the consumers themselves, as well as past literature; (b) co-design between consumer and designer to collect ideas and generate a prototype; (c) consumer wear-testing the product and the designer checking that it adheres to the universal design principles mentioned earlier; (d) industry evaluation and feedback to determine any constraints of the product; and (e) implementation and distribution to ensure that everything works. Carroll and Gross (2010) refined the aforementioned model in a later study to better illustrate the relationship between disability and apparel.…”
Section: Existing Framework For Universal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, universal design made its debut in the field of apparel design (Carroll & Kincade, 2007). As of 2014, there are still very limited numbers of empirical applications available in this particular field (Carroll & Gross, 2010;Martins & Martins, 2012;Park, Morris, Stannard, & Hamilton, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%