2003
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion of the ligand field contribution in a polarizable molecular mechanics: SIBFA‐LF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wheatley & Mitchell (1994) proposed replacing the point multipole with Gaussian multipoles to correctly model the penetration effect at short range. Piquemal et al (2003) used s -type Gaussian functions distributed at multi-sites to represent the charge density. In the recent development of Quantum Mechanics Polarizable Force Field (QMPFF) (Donchev, 2006; Donchev et al , 2005), a model was developed that consists of a nuclear charge and a negative electron cloud of exponential form located off the nuclear center.…”
Section: Modeling Biomolecular Charge Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheatley & Mitchell (1994) proposed replacing the point multipole with Gaussian multipoles to correctly model the penetration effect at short range. Piquemal et al (2003) used s -type Gaussian functions distributed at multi-sites to represent the charge density. In the recent development of Quantum Mechanics Polarizable Force Field (QMPFF) (Donchev, 2006; Donchev et al , 2005), a model was developed that consists of a nuclear charge and a negative electron cloud of exponential form located off the nuclear center.…”
Section: Modeling Biomolecular Charge Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are plethoras of POL models for water, and three main approaches have emerged to calculating POL in empirical force fields: the fluctuating charge method 17,20,21 ; the Drude-oscillator approach 15,23,33,34 ; and the well-studied induced dipole method. 16,24,25,31,32,[35][36][37][38][39] The fluctuating charge and Drude oscillator approaches are unique from the induced dipole model in that they are essentially attempts to extend previous fixed, atom-centered charge models to accommodate POL. By contrast, the induced dipole model incorporates multipole moments beyond the point charge in a formalism where the natural link between the higher order permanent multipoles and the polarizabilities is clear from the fact they are terms of a Taylor expansion of the energy in the electric field E.…”
Section: Polarizable Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…223 The original, pre-DommiMOE implementation of LFMM has been abandoned due to the lack of robust support for the organic force field, 216 and other implementations either depend on DommiMOE, 227 or have not yet been released. 31,[228][229][230][231] Therefore, to increase the accessibility to the LFMM method and support its systematic use in fast fitness, the LFMM method was integrated into the popular and easily accessible cooperatively between the metal centers and might lead to hysteresis, which is a tailored property for technological applications. [241][242][243] Therefore, many Fe(II)-N 6…”
Section: Ligand Field Molecular Mechanics (Lfmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%