2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion of Smoking Data in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Former heavy smokers (ie, those with Ն20 pack-years of smoking) may have higher atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk than never smokers for up to 16 years after smoking cessation. However, the 2013 pooled cohort equations (PCE) do not account for pack-years of smoking and only consider current vs noncurrent smoking status without distinguishing former smokers from never smokers. OBJECTIVE To assess the predictive utility of smoking history when added to the PCE using data from 18 400 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is among the first studies in humans to confirm early alterations in proatherogenic properties of blood monocytes and plasma collected from otherwise healthy young people who smoke TCIGs compared with people who do not use tobacco products. Our findings in TCIG smokers compared with nonsmokers controls are consistent with the notion that this atherogenesis assay is a strong mechanistic tool to predict future cardiovascular risk in humans given the established link of TCIGs with future cardiovascular disease, 9 and provides a rationale for its use in assessing proatherogenic changes in young people who use ECIGs. Similar yet significantly less severe alterations in proatherogenic properties were detected in blood monocytes and plasma collected in otherwise healthy young people who use ECIGs compared with people who do not use tobacco products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, this is among the first studies in humans to confirm early alterations in proatherogenic properties of blood monocytes and plasma collected from otherwise healthy young people who smoke TCIGs compared with people who do not use tobacco products. Our findings in TCIG smokers compared with nonsmokers controls are consistent with the notion that this atherogenesis assay is a strong mechanistic tool to predict future cardiovascular risk in humans given the established link of TCIGs with future cardiovascular disease, 9 and provides a rationale for its use in assessing proatherogenic changes in young people who use ECIGs. Similar yet significantly less severe alterations in proatherogenic properties were detected in blood monocytes and plasma collected in otherwise healthy young people who use ECIGs compared with people who do not use tobacco products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Rather, consistency, direction, and magnitude of the effect in conjunction with the nominal P values were considered to help distinguish true and false-positive findings. 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular diseases are more prevalent in male patients, but women develop these diseases about a decade later than men. This phenomenon may be related to the effect of estrogen on improving vascular endothelial function and reducing LDL-C ( 21 , 22 ). However, most men have histories of smoking and drinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All included studies, even those with a high rating, inherently entail an unavoidable risk of bias, owing to their observational characteristic 31 . And we also hope to collect the data of long Covid patients' BMI 37 , smoking status [38][39][40] , diabetes 41 , high cholesterol 42,43 , vaccination [44][45][46] etc as much as possible, further identifying sources of heterogeneity. But in our study, all the HRs, RRs and ORs are all over >1.0, as well as the absence of publication bias But, the preeminent strategy for averting severe complications stemming from SARS-CoV-2 infection is still vaccination 48,49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity was relatively high, but with the help of Meta-regression, we figured out that country, study design, total number of samples, age at baseline and total months of follow-up should be responsible for sources of heterogeneity to a certain extent Supplementary material online, Appendix Figure. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Meanwhile, owing to the observational research's character, all studies inherently entail an inevitable risk of bias, irrespective of their quality rating 31…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Publication Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%