Including the Reason for Use on Prescriptions Sent to Pharmacists: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background In North America, although pharmacists are obligated to ensure prescribed medications are appropriate, information about a patient’s reason for use is not a required component of a legal prescription. The benefits of prescribers including the reason for use on prescriptions is evident in the current literature. However, it is not standard practice to share this information with pharmacists. Objective Our aim was to characterize the research on how including the reason for use on a prescription impacts pharmacists. Methods We performed an interdisciplinary scoping review, searching literature in the fields of health care, informatics, and engineering. The following databases were searched between December 2018 and January 2019: PubMed, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), and EMBASE. Results A total of 3912 potentially relevant articles were identified, with 9 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. The studies used different terminology (eg, indication, reason for use) and a wide variety of study methodologies, including prospective and retrospective observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and qualitative interviews and focus groups. The results suggest that including the reason for use on a prescription can help the pharmacist catch more errors, reduce the need to contact prescribers, support patient counseling, impact communication, and improve patient safety. Reasons that may prevent prescribers from adding the reason for use information are concerns about workflow and patient privacy. Conclusions More research is needed to understand how the reason for use information should be provided to pharmacists. In the limited literature to date, there is a consensus that the addition of this information to prescriptions benefits patient safety and enables pharmacists to be more effective. Future research should use an implementation science or theory-based approach to improve prescriber buy-in and, consequently, adoption.

Documenting the indication for antimicrobial prescribing: a scoping review

“…Despite these barriers, there is a general theme across all publications that indication documentation associated with prescribing is a best practice with numerous benefits to the quality of patient care1 9 which has been echoed by a recent scoping review evaluating the inclusion of the reason for use when sending prescriptions to pharmacists 145. Our findings help substantiate current recommendations and best practice statements from a number of jurisdictions and organisations that relate to documentation of indication for antimicrobial prescriptions 2 4 146.…”

Prescribing medications with indications: time to flip the script

“…Indications link the evidence-based benefit of a drug for a specific population to a particular patient’s clinical condition. Unfortunately, in prescribing they are more often the ‘missing link’, with explicit documentation of the indication usually missing from the prescription, despite considerable evidence and recommendations (dare we say exhortations) that documenting the indication would make the entire medication use process safer 1–4. Patients want to, need to and have a right to know what each of their medications is for.…”