1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Including spatially variable effective soil depths in TOPMODEL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
11

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
81
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate geological and land-use maps (Figure 2), resulting from air photo analysis, field surveys and site investigations, have been used for the evaluation of the spatial variation of some specific parameters. For instance, the estimation of soil thickness (Figure 10) has been performed by correlating soil depth to the local slope angle (Saulnier et al 1997):…”
Section: Evaluation Of Trigrs Input Parameters and Assumptions In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate geological and land-use maps (Figure 2), resulting from air photo analysis, field surveys and site investigations, have been used for the evaluation of the spatial variation of some specific parameters. For instance, the estimation of soil thickness (Figure 10) has been performed by correlating soil depth to the local slope angle (Saulnier et al 1997):…”
Section: Evaluation Of Trigrs Input Parameters and Assumptions In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…V W max represents the absolute maximum water content of the aquifer on the whole investigated area; the maximum water content on each cell is estimated based on V W max and on the slope (Saulnier et al, 1997). R f is a multiplicative factor in the Darcy equation used to estimate the flux per unit area between two contiguous cells and mainly takes care of differentiating the saturated vertical and horizontal conductivity.…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the spatial variation of soil thickness, the model proposed by Saulnier et al (1997) was applied to the study area (Fig. 7a).…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum and minimum values of slope and soil thickness, which were measured within the source areas of the shallow landslides triggered during the 1 October 2009 event, are equal to 58-17 • and 1.5-0.5 m respectively, and they can be considered reliable since the 2009 landslides mostly involved the entire soil profile. Although the model proposed by Saulnier et al (1997) relies heavily on geomorphological simplifications, it is frequently used to estimate a spatially distributed soil depth field in basin scale modeling (e.g., Salciarini et al, 2006). To reproduce the spatial rainfall distribution of the 1 October 2009 rainstorm, the conditional merging technique (Ehret, 2002;Pegram, 2003) has been chosen as the interpolation method.…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%