2003
DOI: 10.1080/1034912032000120462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Including Learners with Intellectual Disabilities: stressful for teachers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, results of a comparative analysis of three qualitative studies (Oswald, Ackerman, & Engelbrecht, 2000;Prozesky, 1999;Swart & Pettipher, 2000) that were conducted in various parts of the country with the help of focus group interviews and open-ended questionnaires aimed at understanding the attitudes of groups of teachers in South Africa towards inclusive education (before the White Paper was published in 2001) (Swart, Engelbrecht, Eloff, & Pettipher, 2002), indicate that the context of change and inclusive education implies a redefinition of the traditional isolated roles of teachers in mainstream schools to a more collaborative role in the accommodation of diversity in inclusive classrooms. In another study that combined quantitative and qualitative research methods to obtain more detailed data on the stress levels of teachers who already have children with intellectual disabilities in their mainstream classrooms (after the publication of the White Paper) (Engelbrecht, Oswald, Swart, & Eloff, 2003), 55 teachers in two provinces completed an adapted version of a structured questionnaire on teachers' stress and ten participating teachers took part in subsequent in-depth individual interviews. These results indicate that the areas identified as the most stressful (administrative issues, support, the behaviour of a specific child, the teacher's self-perceived competence and the lack of collaboration with parents) all point to the lack of effective preparation of teachers to accommodate unique individual educational needs in their classrooms.…”
Section: Research On the Implementation Of Inclusive Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, results of a comparative analysis of three qualitative studies (Oswald, Ackerman, & Engelbrecht, 2000;Prozesky, 1999;Swart & Pettipher, 2000) that were conducted in various parts of the country with the help of focus group interviews and open-ended questionnaires aimed at understanding the attitudes of groups of teachers in South Africa towards inclusive education (before the White Paper was published in 2001) (Swart, Engelbrecht, Eloff, & Pettipher, 2002), indicate that the context of change and inclusive education implies a redefinition of the traditional isolated roles of teachers in mainstream schools to a more collaborative role in the accommodation of diversity in inclusive classrooms. In another study that combined quantitative and qualitative research methods to obtain more detailed data on the stress levels of teachers who already have children with intellectual disabilities in their mainstream classrooms (after the publication of the White Paper) (Engelbrecht, Oswald, Swart, & Eloff, 2003), 55 teachers in two provinces completed an adapted version of a structured questionnaire on teachers' stress and ten participating teachers took part in subsequent in-depth individual interviews. These results indicate that the areas identified as the most stressful (administrative issues, support, the behaviour of a specific child, the teacher's self-perceived competence and the lack of collaboration with parents) all point to the lack of effective preparation of teachers to accommodate unique individual educational needs in their classrooms.…”
Section: Research On the Implementation Of Inclusive Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*Corresponding author. Email: hsinhui@ntcn.edu.tw Including young children with disabilities in preschool programs designed for their typically developing peers is increasingly common in the United States (National Centre for Education Statistics, 2002) and internationally (Avramidis, Bayliss, & Burden, 2000b;Dupoux, Wolman, & Estrada, 2005;Engelbrecht, Oswald, Swart, & Eloff, 2003;Gilmore, Campbell, & Cuskelly, 2003;Kwon, 2005;Opdal, Wormnaes, & Habayeb, 2001). Major purposes of inclusive or integrated programs include maximising learning opportunities, and broadening social benefits for all children (UNESCO, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inclusive policies are suggested to contribute to a more just and equal society (South African Department of Education, 2001), in part, because they (Oswald, 2007). In fact, South African teachers note that their lack of effective preparation is one of the major stressors about the prospect of inclusive education (Engelbrecht, Oswald, Swart, & Eloff, 2003). In a large study of 2,577 South African primary school teachers, only 36% of teachers could even describe what inclusive education was (Hay, Smit, & Paulsen, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%