2019
DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2019.1634480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incivility behaviours exhibited by nursing students: clinical educators’ perspectives of challenging teaching and assessment events in clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luparell's (2003) seminal study has been the forerunner to further work focused on nursing student's harassment and incivility and led to these types of behaviours being classified into four distinct types -verbal, isolationist, task and dishonesty (White 2010; Table 1). Most studies described incivility or harassing behaviour as being triggered by certain events such as the release of grades, failing course work or the perception of negative feedback (Clarke & Springer, 2010;Anderson, et al, 2019;Christensen, et al, 2020). It was then that the behaviours manifested themselves -yelling, screaming, threats of physical violence and stalking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luparell's (2003) seminal study has been the forerunner to further work focused on nursing student's harassment and incivility and led to these types of behaviours being classified into four distinct types -verbal, isolationist, task and dishonesty (White 2010; Table 1). Most studies described incivility or harassing behaviour as being triggered by certain events such as the release of grades, failing course work or the perception of negative feedback (Clarke & Springer, 2010;Anderson, et al, 2019;Christensen, et al, 2020). It was then that the behaviours manifested themselves -yelling, screaming, threats of physical violence and stalking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third study that reports the same perspective is Lauder et al (2008, p. 106), who stated that ‘good nurses are born not made’. On the other hand, some clinical teachers emphasise learning as a process, suggesting that assessors should support, guide and help students to improve, and in this way develop their professional and ethical behaviour (Andersen et al, 2019). In relation to such a dynamic view of character, it has been pointed out that the level or study‐year of the student affected what they expected of them (Burden et al, 2018; Tanicala et al, 2011) and that students should be evaluated on their progress towards an end goal (DeBrew & Lewallen, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of each study was categorised as high, medium or low. The mixed‐methods studies (Andersen et al, 2019; Burden et al, 2018; Killam et al, 2010; Lauder et al, 2008; Scanlan & Chernomas, 2016) were appraised as either qualitative or quantitative depending on the design and focus of the article. Scanlan and Chernomas (2016) reported only from the qualitative part of their study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice settings, nurse educators can use postconference discussions to enhance dialog 54 . Preceptors can role model civil behavior 55 and nurse educators in practice can survey unit staff on workplace‐related experiences 56 …”
Section: Progression Of Seven Steps For Civility Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%