2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incipient sediment transport for non-cohesive landforms by the discrete element method (DEM)

Abstract: We introduce a numerical method for incipient sediment transport past bedforms. The approach is based on the discrete element method (DEM) (Pérez-Aparicio and Bravo (2006)), simulating the micro-mechanics of the landform as an aggregate of rigid spheres interacting by contact and friction. A continuous finite element approximation ) predicts the boundary shear stress field due to the fluid flow, resulting in drag and lift forces acting over the particles. Numerical experiments verify the method by reproducing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean flow entrainment models derive a transport initiation threshold Shields number from a force balance, and/or torque balance, between mean fluid forces and resisting contact forces acting on a representative particle resting on the bed surface (Agudo et al, 2017;Ali & Dey, 2016;Bagnold, 1936Bagnold, , 1941Bravo et al, 2014Bravo et al, , 2017Claudin & Andreotti, 2006;Dey, 1999Dey, , 2003Dey & Papanicolaou, 2008;Duan et al, 2013;Durán et al, 2011;Edwards & Namikas, 2015;He & Ohara, 2017;Iversen et al, 1976Iversen et al, , 1987Iversen & White, 1982;Lee et al, 2012;Lehning et al, 2000;Ling, 1995;Lu et al, 2005;Luckner & Zanke, 2007;Recking, 2009;Rousar et al, 2016;Schmidt, 1980;Shao & Lu, 2000;Vollmer & Kleinhans, 2007;Ward, 1969;Wiberg & Smith, 1987;White, 1940;Wu & Chou, 2003). Many of these models have been proposed to reproduce the Shields diagram, which displays two kinds of fluvial thresholds: a threshold obtained from extrapolating measurements of the transport rate to (nearly) vanishing transport and visual measurements of the initiation threshold of individual transport (see section 4.3 for details).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Threshold Models 441 Mean Flow Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean flow entrainment models derive a transport initiation threshold Shields number from a force balance, and/or torque balance, between mean fluid forces and resisting contact forces acting on a representative particle resting on the bed surface (Agudo et al, 2017;Ali & Dey, 2016;Bagnold, 1936Bagnold, , 1941Bravo et al, 2014Bravo et al, , 2017Claudin & Andreotti, 2006;Dey, 1999Dey, , 2003Dey & Papanicolaou, 2008;Duan et al, 2013;Durán et al, 2011;Edwards & Namikas, 2015;He & Ohara, 2017;Iversen et al, 1976Iversen et al, , 1987Iversen & White, 1982;Lee et al, 2012;Lehning et al, 2000;Ling, 1995;Lu et al, 2005;Luckner & Zanke, 2007;Recking, 2009;Rousar et al, 2016;Schmidt, 1980;Shao & Lu, 2000;Vollmer & Kleinhans, 2007;Ward, 1969;Wiberg & Smith, 1987;White, 1940;Wu & Chou, 2003). Many of these models have been proposed to reproduce the Shields diagram, which displays two kinds of fluvial thresholds: a threshold obtained from extrapolating measurements of the transport rate to (nearly) vanishing transport and visual measurements of the initiation threshold of individual transport (see section 4.3 for details).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Threshold Models 441 Mean Flow Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental approaches have been applied to determine the threshold for the onset of motion. The studies include parameters such as the particle Reynolds number 13,16,17,18,19,20 , the relative flow submergence 21,22,23,24 or geometrical factors as the angle of repose 16,18,25 , exposure to the flow 26,27,28,29 , relative grain protrusion 29 or streamwise bed slope 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspension density is numerically computed by DEM following the same procedure described for the previous test and Eq. (20). Again, to reduce the CPU cost, the sphere is not simulated as an additional particle for the same reasons as we did not simulate the hydrometer in the ASTM test.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Buoyancy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the depth of the tip of the hydrometer is known, the depth of its center of gravity is computed, and the density of the solution is obtained using (20) considering a single layer extending the height of the bulb. From these two parameters, the pairs (φ o , w o ) are obtained as in the standard.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Astm-d422 Hydrometer Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation