2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cac.2017.8242967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incipient anomaly detection for railway vehicle door system based on adaptive mean shift clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The accuracy of fault identification calculation formula is shown in formula (12), and the statistical results are shown in Table 2. From the results in the table, it can be clearly seen that the accuracy of the fault diagnosis for the four groups of the fault data could reach 100% before and after adding the decision model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental results are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The accuracy of fault identification calculation formula is shown in formula (12), and the statistical results are shown in Table 2. From the results in the table, it can be clearly seen that the accuracy of the fault diagnosis for the four groups of the fault data could reach 100% before and after adding the decision model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the temperature data of train bearings obtained using the WTDS system was used to monitor the condition of an axle box bearing. Han et al 12 proposed an adaptive mean shift clustering algorithm in which the common and frequent anomalies in a train door system could be successfully detected and isolated.…”
Section: Abnormal Bearing Temperature Detection Based On Outlier Dete...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional detection methods can be subdivided into classification-based [2], density-based [11], statistically based [13] and spectrum-based anomaly detection algorithms [20]. Although these methods are mathematically simple and easy to implement [33], they are difficult to adapt to dynamic changes in passenger flow data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced monitoring technologies leveraging big data analytics and intelligent algorithms offer a promising approach to achieving high accuracy and reliability in detecting anomalies in URTNs [7]. Many automatic anomaly detection models are widely studied in passenger flow anomaly detection, such as the Z-score [8], 3-sigma [9], K-nearest neighbour (KNN) [10], density-based spatial clustering of application with noise (DBSCAN) [11], autoencoder (AE) [12] and principal component analysis algorithms [13]. However, it is difficult for these models to capture the temporal and spatial dependencies in passenger flows, especially for anomaly detection at the network level [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%