Abstract:Previous research investigating L2 incidental vocabulary learning from video has primarily focused on short videos from genres that may be conducive to vocabulary learning. The research provides evidence that L2 incidental vocabulary learning can occur through video. However, it is uncertain whether viewing episodes of full-length television programs can contribute to incidental learning. This study investigated the effects of viewing 7+ hours of television on incidental vocabulary learning as well as the effe… Show more
“…Puimège and Peters () demonstrated that learners can also learn the form of unfamiliar lexical items (i.e., single words as well as formulaic sequences) through TV viewing. Looking at extensive TV viewing (i.e., watching 10 full‐length episodes from one TV show), Rodgers and Webb () found that adult EFL learners learned six new words on average and that the learning gains were comparable to those found in reading studies. However, the control group also learned five new words.…”
Section: Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also addressed the role of a number of word‐related variables in vocabulary learning through TV viewing. Frequency of occurrence has been found to affect word learning positively (Peters & Webb, ), although its effect seems to be smaller in longitudinal studies that investigated extensive viewing (Rodgers & Webb, ). In a recent study, Puimège and Peters () found that a word’s corpus frequency was positively correlated to word learning at the level of form recall.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most research into incidental vocabulary learning has focused on reading (e.g., Pellicer-S anchez & Schmitt, 2010;Webb & Chang, 2015) and some studies have explored vocabulary learning through listening (van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013;Vidal, 2003Vidal, , 2011, recent studies have shown that learners can also learn new vocabulary (Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2019) when they watch foreign-language TV. Peters and Webb (2018) found that learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) picked up four words on average while watching a full-length, 1-hour TV program compared to 1.5 words in the control group.…”
Section: Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on learning vocabulary from audiovisual input. They have shown that learners can pick up new words incidentally when watching TV (Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Research has also shown that on-screen text (first language or foreign language subtitles) might increase learning gains (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014;Winke, Gass, & Sydorenko, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have focused on written input (e.g., Pellicer-S anchez & Schmitt, 2010;Webb & Chang, 2015), but studies on the effects of audiovisual input have recently been gaining traction in the field of second language acquisition (e.g., Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2017). There is growing evidence that FL vocabulary can be picked up incidentally through watching short video clips (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014;Neuman & Koskinen, 1992;Puim ege & Peters, 2019), fulllength TV programs (Peters & Webb, 2018), and extensive TV viewing (Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Neuman and Koskinen (1992) were among the first to highlight the potential of audiovisual input for vocabulary learning.…”
In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on learning vocabulary from audiovisual input. They have shown that learners can pick up new words incidentally when watching TV (Peters & Webb, 2018; Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Research has also shown that on‐screen text (first language or foreign language subtitles) might increase learning gains (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014; Winke, Gass, & Sydorenko, 2010). Learning is sometimes explained in terms of the beneficial role of on‐screen imagery in audiovisual input (Rodgers, 2018). However, little is known about imagery’s effect on word learning and how it interacts with L1 subtitles and captions. This study investigates the effect of imagery in three TV viewing conditions: with L1 subtitles, with captions, and without subtitles. Data were collected with 142 Dutch‐speaking learners of English as a foreign language. A pretest‐posttest design was adopted in which learners watched a 12‐minute excerpt from a documentary. The findings show that the captions group made the most vocabulary learning gains. Moreover, imagery was positively related to word learning. This means that words that were shown in close proximity to the aural occurrence of the words were more likely to be learned.
“…Puimège and Peters () demonstrated that learners can also learn the form of unfamiliar lexical items (i.e., single words as well as formulaic sequences) through TV viewing. Looking at extensive TV viewing (i.e., watching 10 full‐length episodes from one TV show), Rodgers and Webb () found that adult EFL learners learned six new words on average and that the learning gains were comparable to those found in reading studies. However, the control group also learned five new words.…”
Section: Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also addressed the role of a number of word‐related variables in vocabulary learning through TV viewing. Frequency of occurrence has been found to affect word learning positively (Peters & Webb, ), although its effect seems to be smaller in longitudinal studies that investigated extensive viewing (Rodgers & Webb, ). In a recent study, Puimège and Peters () found that a word’s corpus frequency was positively correlated to word learning at the level of form recall.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most research into incidental vocabulary learning has focused on reading (e.g., Pellicer-S anchez & Schmitt, 2010;Webb & Chang, 2015) and some studies have explored vocabulary learning through listening (van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013;Vidal, 2003Vidal, , 2011, recent studies have shown that learners can also learn new vocabulary (Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2019) when they watch foreign-language TV. Peters and Webb (2018) found that learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) picked up four words on average while watching a full-length, 1-hour TV program compared to 1.5 words in the control group.…”
Section: Vocabulary Learning From Audiovisual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on learning vocabulary from audiovisual input. They have shown that learners can pick up new words incidentally when watching TV (Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Research has also shown that on-screen text (first language or foreign language subtitles) might increase learning gains (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014;Winke, Gass, & Sydorenko, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have focused on written input (e.g., Pellicer-S anchez & Schmitt, 2010;Webb & Chang, 2015), but studies on the effects of audiovisual input have recently been gaining traction in the field of second language acquisition (e.g., Peters & Webb, 2018;Rodgers & Webb, 2017). There is growing evidence that FL vocabulary can be picked up incidentally through watching short video clips (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014;Neuman & Koskinen, 1992;Puim ege & Peters, 2019), fulllength TV programs (Peters & Webb, 2018), and extensive TV viewing (Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Neuman and Koskinen (1992) were among the first to highlight the potential of audiovisual input for vocabulary learning.…”
In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on learning vocabulary from audiovisual input. They have shown that learners can pick up new words incidentally when watching TV (Peters & Webb, 2018; Rodgers & Webb, 2019). Research has also shown that on‐screen text (first language or foreign language subtitles) might increase learning gains (Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014; Winke, Gass, & Sydorenko, 2010). Learning is sometimes explained in terms of the beneficial role of on‐screen imagery in audiovisual input (Rodgers, 2018). However, little is known about imagery’s effect on word learning and how it interacts with L1 subtitles and captions. This study investigates the effect of imagery in three TV viewing conditions: with L1 subtitles, with captions, and without subtitles. Data were collected with 142 Dutch‐speaking learners of English as a foreign language. A pretest‐posttest design was adopted in which learners watched a 12‐minute excerpt from a documentary. The findings show that the captions group made the most vocabulary learning gains. Moreover, imagery was positively related to word learning. This means that words that were shown in close proximity to the aural occurrence of the words were more likely to be learned.
The use of video streaming services has exploded over the past several years. However, although the use of video is a well-studied topic in computer-assisted language learning literature, the use of video streaming for out-of-class, informal foreign language (FL) learning has received little attention. This study addresses this gap in the literature.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.