1960
DOI: 10.1037/h0046566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental stimulation: A study of preconscious transformations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of interest to note in light of the research to be described below that the use of subliminal stimuli as a means of investigating unconscious processes was introduced into contemporary psychology by a group of psychoanalytically oriented researchers, beginning with Fisher's pioneering contributions in the fifties (Fisher, 1954(Fisher, , 1956(Fisher, , 1957. Shortly thereafter, Dixon in England followed Fisher's lead (Dixon, 1956(Dixon, , 1958a, as did researchers at the Research Center for Mental Health at New York University (Klein, Spence, Holt, & Gourevitch 1958;Klein & Holt, 1960;Eagle, 1959;Eagle, Wolitzky, & Klein, 1966;Pine, 1960Pine, , 1961Spence, 1961Spence, , 1964 and researchers at the Menninger Foundation (Luborsky & Shevrin, 1956;Shevrin & Luborsky, 1958;Stross & Shevrin, 1962. These early studies were criticized by behaviorists such as Goldiamond (1958) and Eriksen (1960) on some of the same methodological grounds as Holender (1986) has more recently revived.…”
Section: The Role Of Subliminal Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest to note in light of the research to be described below that the use of subliminal stimuli as a means of investigating unconscious processes was introduced into contemporary psychology by a group of psychoanalytically oriented researchers, beginning with Fisher's pioneering contributions in the fifties (Fisher, 1954(Fisher, , 1956(Fisher, , 1957. Shortly thereafter, Dixon in England followed Fisher's lead (Dixon, 1956(Dixon, , 1958a, as did researchers at the Research Center for Mental Health at New York University (Klein, Spence, Holt, & Gourevitch 1958;Klein & Holt, 1960;Eagle, 1959;Eagle, Wolitzky, & Klein, 1966;Pine, 1960Pine, , 1961Spence, 1961Spence, , 1964 and researchers at the Menninger Foundation (Luborsky & Shevrin, 1956;Shevrin & Luborsky, 1958;Stross & Shevrin, 1962. These early studies were criticized by behaviorists such as Goldiamond (1958) and Eriksen (1960) on some of the same methodological grounds as Holender (1986) has more recently revived.…”
Section: The Role Of Subliminal Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we have been unable to locate experimental studies that bear directly upon the above problem, there are several lines of investigation of attention that are relevant. Goldstein and Barthol (1960) and Pine (1960Pine ( , 1961 have sought transformed 1 This research was supported by Mental Health Grant M-1206, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, and National Science Foundation Grant G-22139. or indirect effects of nonattended stimulation in subsequent imaginative productions of 5s and the voluminous work on learning without awareness (Eriksen, 1962) may be viewed as an attempt to determine whether nonattended stimuli enter into the learning process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the findings reported were the following: Compared to focal stimuli, incidental stimuli influenced subjects' subsequent imaginative stories in accord with the latter's symbolic meanings (Pine, 1960). Compared to a high level of attention, when subjects were presented a list of words under conditions of low attention (manipulated through a distraction task), their processing of the stimulus words were more likely to be based on the sound rather than the semantic meaning of the words (Eagle & Ortof, 1967).…”
Section: Degree Of Awareness and Attention And Stimulus Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1950s and 1960s a number of studies on the question of degree of awareness and attention and stimulus organization were carried out at the New York University Research Center for Mental Health (e.g., Eagle, 1959;Eagle & Ortof, 1967;Eagle, Wolitzky, & Klein, 1966;Klein, Spence, Holt, & Gourevitch, 1958;Paul & Fisher, 1959;Pine 1960Pine , 1961Smith et al, 1959;Spence & Holland, 1962). Among the findings reported were the following: Compared to focal stimuli, incidental stimuli influenced subjects' subsequent imaginative stories in accord with the latter's symbolic meanings (Pine, 1960).…”
Section: Degree Of Awareness and Attention And Stimulus Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%