1996
DOI: 10.1177/000992289603500510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Pineal Cysts in a Prospectively Ascertained Normal Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Thirteen percent of subjects in this study demonstrated cystic changes in the pineal gland. A possible explanation for the difference between the prevalence of the pineal cysts demonstrated in our study and that in other MR imaging studies is that we used high-resolution MR imaging with a 1.0 mm resolution on the 3D T1WI and an in-plane resolution of 1.0 mm with an axial resolution of 2.0 mm on the T2WI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…17 Thirteen percent of subjects in this study demonstrated cystic changes in the pineal gland. A possible explanation for the difference between the prevalence of the pineal cysts demonstrated in our study and that in other MR imaging studies is that we used high-resolution MR imaging with a 1.0 mm resolution on the 3D T1WI and an in-plane resolution of 1.0 mm with an axial resolution of 2.0 mm on the T2WI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…An in-plane resolution of 1.0 mm and an axial resolution of 3.0 mm were used in the prior MR imaging study of healthy volunteers. 17 Because the smallest reported pineal cyst was 2.0 mm, 8 we classified MR imaging signal intensity changes compatible with pineal cysts but less than 2.0 mm in diameter as being pineal cystic changes; they were not considered pineal cysts. The high prevalence rate of pineal cysts and cystic changes demonstrated in this study is consistent with prior autopsy studies that showed macroscopic (measuring up to 0.5 ϫ 0.3 ϫ 0.2 cm) and microscopic cysts in 21.8% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, who died from various diseases in 168 consecutive cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6,19,52,59 There have been several prior attempts to analyze the prevalence of pineal cysts in patients undergoing intracranial imaging, with estimates ranging from 1.0% to 4.3%. 3,7,15,22,[33][34][35]40,51,61 In the largest series of pineal cysts in adults prior to our current study, Sawamura et al 59 evaluated MR images from 6023 patients and found 79 pineal cysts (prevalence of 1.3%). In an age-specific prevalence analysis, these authors found a decrease in the prevalence of pineal cysts on imaging in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%