2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental lesions found in veterans referred to dermatology: The value of a dermatologic examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this difference was not statistically significant, and a larger sample size would be beneficial in clarifying the significance of this trend. The observed keratinocytic carcinoma detection rates for SAF teledermatology and F2F consultation in this study (5.5% and 8.5%, respectively) are comparable to prior studies in the VA and general population …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this difference was not statistically significant, and a larger sample size would be beneficial in clarifying the significance of this trend. The observed keratinocytic carcinoma detection rates for SAF teledermatology and F2F consultation in this study (5.5% and 8.5%, respectively) are comparable to prior studies in the VA and general population …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In most of these cases, the lesions for which the patients were initially referred turned out to be benign . In a separate study of over 17,000 dermatology consults within the VA Healthcare system, 6.9% of patients had incidental skin cancers, and 0.05% had incidental melanomas . The incidence of detected skin cancers via face‐to‐face consultation (F2F) may potentially be higher than that of SAF teledermatology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have shown that dermatologist discovered melanomas were thinner melanomas, while more invasive melanomas are found by the PCP. 14 We ascertained the time interval between the biopsy and the previous SFT visit. This ranged from as few as 21 days to as many as 930 days ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] This concern is more related to the perceived inability of primary care providers (PCPs) to direct imaging of suspicious lesions than to the SFT dermatologist's ability to diagnose them. [12][13][14] At least three previous studies have ascertained the frequency of ''incidental'' melanomas in populations of patients referred for FTF dermatology care. An incidental melanoma is defined as a melanoma discovered by a dermatologist during full body skin examination (FBSE), but was not the subject of the referral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation