2015
DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s93654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental detection of a small solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas after a traffic accident in a 12-year-old girl: a case report

Abstract: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor of the pancreas that tends to grow silently in patients at a young age, to a large size and mass. We report here a case of a small-sized SPN detected incidentally in a 12-year-old girl following a traffic accident. The tumor was 3.5 cm in maximal diameter and was found to have hemorrhagic necrosis without a solid component. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed which cured the patient. SPN is generally accepted to be a low grade … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It still remains unclear whether the tumor composition can be used as a malignant risk factor. It has to be clarified whether SPN with a malignant potential tend to grow larger, or tend to become more solid and larger at the same time [106]. Results are summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Malignancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It still remains unclear whether the tumor composition can be used as a malignant risk factor. It has to be clarified whether SPN with a malignant potential tend to grow larger, or tend to become more solid and larger at the same time [106]. Results are summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Malignancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, only a total of 34 pediatric patients (less than 18 years old) has undergone MIDP for SPN of the pancreatic body or tail in English literature ( Table 1 ) [ 2 , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] ]. Of 34 MIDPs, spleen preservation was attempted in 26 cases; however, splenectomy was required for 2 cases, one for a tumor in the close vicinity of the splenic hilum and the other one for a tumor in which the splenic vessels were embedded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%