2014
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.20.8699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Abnormal FDG Uptake in the Prostate on 18-fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated the clinical significance of 18 F-FDG positive prostate incidentalomas (11,12,13,14,15,16,17). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of unexpected focal uptake of 18 F-FDG on PET/CT in the prostate glands of cancer patients and to detect the proportion of malignant cases within this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the clinical significance of 18 F-FDG positive prostate incidentalomas (11,12,13,14,15,16,17). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of unexpected focal uptake of 18 F-FDG on PET/CT in the prostate glands of cancer patients and to detect the proportion of malignant cases within this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many literature reports suggest PIU is not infrequent and is often indicative of malignancy [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Results on the prevalence of PIU and the incidence of malignancy in studies available in the literature and in this work are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The pooled risk of malignancy with biopsy verification was 62% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 54–71%). It has been suggested that incidental prostate uptake on FDG PET scans should not be ignored and at least a serum PSA measurement should be considered (13, 14). …”
Section: Detection Of Primary Prostate Tumormentioning
confidence: 99%