2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13025-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incident Mining Using Structural Prototypes

Abstract: Abstract. Software and other technical products offered to a mass market have a high demand on support and help desks. A tool for automated classification of incident reports, errors and other customer requests which offers previous (successful) hints or solution procedures could efficiently decrease support costs. We propose an approach to mining incidents and other customer requests for support based on generalising structural prototypes from structured data. Retrieval can then be efficiently realised by mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the expression father(X,Y) is a generalizer of both father(john,sam) and father(tom,sam), but their least general generalizer, also known as most specific generalizer (msg) and least common anti-instance (lcai), is father(X,sam). Applications of generalization arise in many artificial intelligence areas, including case-based reasoning, analogy making, web and data mining, ontology learning, machine learning, theorem proving, and inductive logic programming, among others [5,12,13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the expression father(X,Y) is a generalizer of both father(john,sam) and father(tom,sam), but their least general generalizer, also known as most specific generalizer (msg) and least common anti-instance (lcai), is father(X,sam). Applications of generalization arise in many artificial intelligence areas, including case-based reasoning, analogy making, web and data mining, ontology learning, machine learning, theorem proving, and inductive logic programming, among others [5,12,13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%