Incidencia del trastorno por duelo prolongado en los allegados de pacientes fallecidos durante o tras ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos

Villar, S. Rodríguez; Casado, Marcelino Sánchez; Prigerson, Holly G.; García, Silvia Mesa; Martin, Victor; Schulke, C. Marco; Vega, R. Barrientos; Quintana, M Amigo; Abellanas, G. Leóz

doi:10.1016/j.redar.2012.06.006

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two articles point out that there is no statistically significant relationship between the age of the mourner and the CG (Ridaura et al, 2017;Villacieros et al, 2014), and two others find no significant differences between the group with complicated grief and normal grief in this variable (Estevan et al, 2016;Masferrer et al, 2017). An inverse relationship between the age of the deceased and the symptomatology of complicated grief is observed (Estevan et al, 2016;Romero & Cruzado, 2016), which is not detected in two other studies comparing age groups of the deceased (Camacho, 2013;Rodríguez et al, 2012).…”

Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Although the study of Estevan et al (2016) finds a higher percentage of women than men with complicated grief, the other studies examining this variable find no significant relationship between gender and this problem (Bermejo et al, 2012;Fernández-Alcántara et al, 2016;Masferrer et al, 2017;Rodríguez et al, 2012;Villacieros et al, 2014).…”

Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Only 6 of the 12 studies analysed include diagnostic prevalence data (Barreto et al, 2008;Estevan et al, 2016;Iribarne et al, 2002;Masferrer et al, 2017;Rodríguez et al, 2012;Romero & Cruzado, 2016). Four of them are the aforementioned works that allude to specific diagnoses of complicated grief and that base their data on diagnostic measures (Barreto et al, 2008;Estevan et al, 2016;Rodríguez et al, 2012;Romero & Cruzado, 2016) although it is important to add that, with the exception of the work of Rodríguez et al (2012), these studies also include prevalence rates based on symptomatic instruments such as the ICG and TRIG. The remaining 2 studies (Iribarne et al, 2002;Masferrer et al, 2017) do not specify a diagnostic category and establish prevalence rates solely based on ICG scores.…”

Section: Prevalence and Symptomatology Of Complicated Grief According To The Diagnostic Category And Measuring Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study using the PG-12 within two months of the loss (Romero & Cruzado, 2016) shows prevalence data of 10.6%, while another study that applies the PG-13 between 6-18 months after the loss (Estevan et al, 2016) shows prevalence data of 7.02%. Similarly, when the consensus criteria for the PGD are used, at 12 months, there are complicated grief percentages of 10.3% (Rodríguez et al, 2012), and of 15.5% when DSM-IV-TR indicators are valued at 6 months (Barreto et al, 2008). Also, the last study includes the clinical assessment of an expert evaluator, who finds a higher percentage, 22.7%, but without specifying the criteria on which it is based.…”

Section: Prevalence and Symptomatology Of Complicated Grief According To The Diagnostic Category And Measuring Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, two studies (Estevan et al, 2016;Rodríguez et al, 2012) indicate that people with PGD needed significantly more professional attention.…”

Section: Social Support and Seeking Professional Helpmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Duelo complicado: Una revisión sistemática de la prevalencia, diagnóstico, factores de riesgo y de protección en población adulta de España.

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo principal de este trabajo fue revisar el estado de la investigación psicopatológica del duelo complicado en población adulta de España. Una búsqueda sistemática en PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PTSDpubs y PSICODOC identificó 13 estudios en los que, en conjunto, se había evaluado a 1,655 adultos. Los resultados de esta revisión ponen de manifiesto que no existe consenso en el diagnóstico de duelo complicado, en el uso de instrumentos de detección ni en los factores de riesgo y protección del duelo complicado. La prevalencia media ponderada basada en 6 de los estudios revisados fue de 21,53%. Tomando en consideración el tipo de instrumento de medida del duelo utilizado, se obtuvo una prevalencia de 7,67-10,68% en aquellos estudios que utilizaban instrumentos diagnósticos y de 28,77% en los instrumentos sintomáticos. Los resultados indican que el duelo complicado se relaciona con: un menor nivel socioeconómico y situación laboral desfavorable, la pérdida de un hijo o cónyuge, menor edad del fallecido, vulnerabilidad psicológica previa, consumo de psicofármacos y comorbilidad con otros trastornos. El apoyo social, los cuidados paliativos, las estrategias de afrontamiento centradas en el problema, el empleo de actividades agradables y la trascendencia o espiritualidad se presentan como factores protectores. The main objective of this research was to review the status of the psychopathological investigation of complicated grief in adult population of Spain. A systematic review on PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PTSDpubs, and PSICODOC databases identified 13 studies in which, overall, 1.655 adults had been evaluated. The results of this review show that there is no consensus in the diagnosis of complicated grief, in the use of detection instruments, or in the risk and protective factors for complicated grief. The weighted mean prevalence based on 6 of the reviewed studies was 21.53%. Taking into account the type of grief measurement used, a prevalence of 7.67-10.68% was obtained in those studies that used diagnostic instruments and 28.77% in the ones using symptomatic instruments. The results indicate that complicated grief is related to: a lower socioeconomic level and unfavorable work situation, the loss of a child or spouse, younger age of the deceased, previous psychological vulnerability, the use of psychotropic medication and comorbidity with other disorders. Social support, palliative care, problem-centered coping strategies, the use of pleasant activities, and transcendence or spirituality are shown as protective factors.

show abstract

Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Prevalence and Symptomatology Of Complicated Grief According To The Diagnostic Category And Measuring Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prevalence and Symptomatology Of Complicated Grief According To The Diagnostic Category And Measuring Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, two studies (Estevan et al, 2016;Rodríguez et al, 2012) indicate that people with PGD needed significantly more professional attention.…”

Section: Social Support and Seeking Professional Helpmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Duelo complicado: Una revisión sistemática de la prevalencia, diagnóstico, factores de riesgo y de protección en población adulta de España.

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Beyond Semantics: ‘Disproportionate Use of Intensive Care Resources’ or ‘Medical Futility’?

Kompanje

Bakker

2017

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Incidencia del trastorno por duelo prolongado en los allegados de pacientes fallecidos durante o tras ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos

Cited by 2 publications

References 35 publications

Duelo complicado: Una revisión sistemática de la prevalencia, diagnóstico, factores de riesgo y de protección en población adulta de España.

Duelo complicado: Una revisión sistemática de la prevalencia, diagnóstico, factores de riesgo y de protección en población adulta de España.

Beyond Semantics: ‘Disproportionate Use of Intensive Care Resources’ or ‘Medical Futility’?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About