Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1820-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence, risk factors, and reasons for hospitalization among glioblastoma patients receiving chemoradiation

Abstract: Despite a high symptom burden, little is known about the incidence or predictors of hospitalization among glioblastoma patients, including risks during chemoradiation (CRT). We studied 196 consecutive newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated at our institution from 2006-2010. Toxicity data were reviewed during and after the CRT phase, defined as the period between diagnosis and 6 weeks after radiotherapy completion. Logistic regression and proportional hazards modeling identified predictors of hospitaliza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 60% of patients were concerned by posttreatment adverse neurological events, while around half of them had no visible progression. The occurrence of such events were correlated with lower OS as already described in the literature [9]. The presence of neurological disability at baseline was associated with neither worsened OS nor higher occurrence of post-treatment neurological events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around 60% of patients were concerned by posttreatment adverse neurological events, while around half of them had no visible progression. The occurrence of such events were correlated with lower OS as already described in the literature [9]. The presence of neurological disability at baseline was associated with neither worsened OS nor higher occurrence of post-treatment neurological events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…ii) neurological symptoms (following progression or treatment toxicities) may have dramatic consequences on independence and/or quality of life for such a frail population [6] [7]; iii) the life expectancy is extremely poor but has increased in the last decade with the development of post-operative treatments [2]; iv) GBM-speci c geriatric scales of frailty are still lacking. Age and performance status (PS) >2 are common negative prognostic factors [8] [9]. MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) DNA-repair gene silencing and its consequence on therapeutics have been investigated considerably [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLC cutoff of less than 0.2k/μL and the 2-month time point were chosen based on previous studies reporting these measures of TRL as predictors of worse survival. G4 lymphopenia [7][8][9][10] and persistent lymphopenia at 2 months after initiating CRT [13][14][15][16][17] have been correlated with poorer survival in other solid malignancies. Characteristics of patients with versus without G4 TRL at 2 months were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test statistics for categorical variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,9,[20][21][22] High glycemia and prolonged hospitalization also represent unfavorable prognostic factors. 23,24 In the EORTC-NCIC trial, the addition of temozolomide and the methylation of MGMT promoter are the two main factors that impact OS. In a study aiming to identify prognostic factors for survival in 333 patients with malignant gliomas included phase I and II clinical trials, 22 age, poor Karnofsky performance status, corticosteroid use, short PFS, tumor outside of the frontal lobe, and grade IV gliomas, which were associated with a shorter OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%