2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
56
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
56
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Intra-arterial needle tip placement during TFESI can, in fact, not be excluded with certainty by using intermittent fluoroscopy, 26,27 aspiration, 27-30 contrast injection, 1 or even digital subtraction angiography. 1,31 In addition, none of these imaging methods would help avoid other injury mechanisms such as arterial transection or dissection.…”
Section: Misconceptions Regarding Spinal Vascular Anatomy and The "Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Intra-arterial needle tip placement during TFESI can, in fact, not be excluded with certainty by using intermittent fluoroscopy, 26,27 aspiration, 27-30 contrast injection, 1 or even digital subtraction angiography. 1,31 In addition, none of these imaging methods would help avoid other injury mechanisms such as arterial transection or dissection.…”
Section: Misconceptions Regarding Spinal Vascular Anatomy and The "Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coupled with the pain at injection site lead us to admit all patients for a minimum of 12 hours. 17 This is the justification for the 24 hours' admission of the highvolume group. All patients with low volume injections were comfortable within 2 hours of injection and did not warrant admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the injections guided with contrast material and fluoroscopy, the rate of vascular penetration was reported to be 8.9% to 21.3%. [8] In case of dural puncture, intrathecal analgesic/ corticosteroid injection may cause to compression, cauda equina syndrome, neural toxicity or local anesthetic toxicity because of increased volume of neural elements. [9] The most common complication of dural puncture is to introduce the anesthetic substance into subdural space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%