2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of sharps injuries in surgical units, a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on operating rooms, biological risk perception is often related to sharp and jagged surgical tools and contamination with patients' blood, especially in open surgery. In a 2019 meta-analysis, it was shown that the sharps injury rate in the surgical area was about 1 in 10 operations [36]. Although many workers have the perception of the biological agents in their workplace settings, and thus on the related risk, knowledge on this issue is still lacking, suggesting the need for specific biological risk training to reduce this lack and improve health and safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on operating rooms, biological risk perception is often related to sharp and jagged surgical tools and contamination with patients' blood, especially in open surgery. In a 2019 meta-analysis, it was shown that the sharps injury rate in the surgical area was about 1 in 10 operations [36]. Although many workers have the perception of the biological agents in their workplace settings, and thus on the related risk, knowledge on this issue is still lacking, suggesting the need for specific biological risk training to reduce this lack and improve health and safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the postulates were assigned a rank. In the first group of most important priorities (i.e., high number of credits [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]), four postulates were included. In the second group of moderate priorities (4-7 credits), there were seven postulates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perioperative environment is a high‐risk setting for percutaneous injury, exposure to bloodborne pathogens, and occupational transmission of disease because of the presence of large quantities of blood and other potentially infectious body fluids, prolonged exposure to open surgical sites, frequent handling of sharp items and instruments, and the requirement for coordination between team members when passing sharp surgical instruments . A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of 45 studies on the incidence of sharps injuries in surgical units found that a surgeon will experience a sharps injury during approximately 1 in 10 operations …”
Section: Sharps Injury Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%