2013
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Repeat Amputation after Partial First Ray Amputation Associated with Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Neuropathy: An 11-Year Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy who undergo a partial first ray amputation show a high rate of progression to a more proximal repeat amputation, despite initial healing. 14,15 Our results are consistent with these reports. Two possible mechanisms, one based on the angiosome and the other based on anatomy, may explain these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It has been reported that patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy who undergo a partial first ray amputation show a high rate of progression to a more proximal repeat amputation, despite initial healing. 14,15 Our results are consistent with these reports. Two possible mechanisms, one based on the angiosome and the other based on anatomy, may explain these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…16 For the same reasons, multiple other studies have concluded that digital amputation is neither reliable nor durable. 13,18 Outcomes of TMAs seem to be more consistent in the literature. Tracy et al 19 reported a 70% healing rate after TMA and a 4.8% hospital mortality rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although FRA seems to affect gait less than a more proximal amputation, at least with respect to asymmetry of the gait, published studies have reported that patients who undergo partial FRA often progress to requiring a more proximal repeat amputation (37). We believe that the risk of new ulceration, resulting in a new amputation, will be greater for those undergoing FRA rather than a more proximal amputation owing to the better weightbearing with the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%