2010
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181e01270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Primary Blast Injury in US Military Overseas Contingency Operations

Abstract: Injury severity and incidence of primary blast injury increased during the 4-year period, whereas return-to-duty rates decreased. Despite increasingly devastating injuries, the mortality rate due to explosion injuries remained low and unchanged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramasamy et al [11] themselves state very explicitly 'We report a different pattern of injury caused by the EFP-IED compared with conventional explosive devices'. A very recent review of military casualties [12] concluded that 71 per cent of combat casualties admitted to medical treatment facilities during [2003][2004][2005][2006] were the result of explosions, and the proportion of these suffering blast lung injury was very small (3.6%). However, the definition of blast lung (a primary blast injury) used in this study could have significantly underestimated the true incidence since 'Patients found to have rib-fractures, scapula fractures, or open wounds to the chest were included in the study but were considered to have injuries caused by secondary or tertiary explosive mechanisms' [12].…”
Section: Classification Of Blast Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ramasamy et al [11] themselves state very explicitly 'We report a different pattern of injury caused by the EFP-IED compared with conventional explosive devices'. A very recent review of military casualties [12] concluded that 71 per cent of combat casualties admitted to medical treatment facilities during [2003][2004][2005][2006] were the result of explosions, and the proportion of these suffering blast lung injury was very small (3.6%). However, the definition of blast lung (a primary blast injury) used in this study could have significantly underestimated the true incidence since 'Patients found to have rib-fractures, scapula fractures, or open wounds to the chest were included in the study but were considered to have injuries caused by secondary or tertiary explosive mechanisms' [12].…”
Section: Classification Of Blast Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent review of military casualties [12] concluded that 71 per cent of combat casualties admitted to medical treatment facilities during [2003][2004][2005][2006] were the result of explosions, and the proportion of these suffering blast lung injury was very small (3.6%). However, the definition of blast lung (a primary blast injury) used in this study could have significantly underestimated the true incidence since 'Patients found to have rib-fractures, scapula fractures, or open wounds to the chest were included in the study but were considered to have injuries caused by secondary or tertiary explosive mechanisms' [12]. While this is a very 'safe' definition of blast lung where it is essential to exclude all other possibilities, it will exclude blast lung injuries when it co-exists with other injury types, which is common with conventional munitions and terrorist bombs and hence may underestimate the occurrence of blast lung in current in military casualties.…”
Section: Classification Of Blast Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemodynamic parameters, namely, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac function index (CFI), and extravascular lung water index (ELWI), were assessed with pulse-induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO, Pulsion, Germany) using the thermal dilution method prior to the burn injury experiment at 30 min, as well as at 2,4,8,12,18, and 24 h after injury [11][12][13].…”
Section: Hemodynamics Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of high-technology weaponry, the morbidity of combined injuries sustained in local wars and terrorist attacks has increased rapidly [1,2]. The detonation of an explosive generates shock wave and heat, causing burn-blast combined injury and aggravating the wound by the interaction of blast and burns [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explosive or blast injuries are a current and very significant clinical issue in military medicine, with a significant number of casualties being injured by improvised explosive devices in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan [1][2][3]. Unfortunately, blast injuries also impact on civilian medicine, most dramatically when terrorist bombings cause mass casualties [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%