Abstract:This study sought to evaluate the incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma reversal at a single institution. This is a retrospective analysis from 2001 to 2011 evaluating the following demographics: age, gender, indication for stoma, urgent versus elective operation, time to closure, total follow-up time, the incidence of and reoperation for stoma incisional hernia, diabetes, postoperative wound infection, smoking status within six months of surgery, body mass index, and any immunosuppressive me… Show more
“…The effects of hypertension on wound healing are less clear; possibly chronic microvascular changes secondary to hypertension could impair adequate tissue perfusion, thereby reducing proper wound healing and contributing to possible wound dehiscence. It is likely that other factors identified in previous studies, such as diabetes mellitus and wound infection, are also independent risk factors for hernia development. The low incidence of these factors in the present study might explain why they were not identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Several previous studies have looked at possible risk factors for incisional hernia following stoma reversal. High BMI and having a temporary colostomy were identified as significant risk factors in several of these studies , . Parastomal hernia, stoma prolapse and hypertension have not been identified previously; most of these factors were not included in other studies.…”
BackgroundStoma reversal is often considered a straightforward procedure with low short‐term complication rates. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of incisional hernia following stoma reversal and identify risk factors for its development.MethodsThis was an observational study of consecutive patients who underwent stoma reversal between 2009 and 2015 at a teaching hospital. Patients followed for at least 12 months were eligible. The primary outcome was the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. Independent risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsAfter a median follow‐up of 24 (range 12–89) months, 110 of 318 included patients (34·6 per cent) developed an incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In 85 (77·3 per cent) the hernia was symptomatic, and 72 patients (65·5 per cent) underwent surgical correction. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR) 1·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·21), stoma prolapse (OR 3·27, 1·04 to 10·27), parastomal hernia (OR 5·08, 1·30 to 19·85) and hypertension (OR 2·52, 1·14 to 5·54) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In addition, the risk of incisional hernia was greater in patients with underlying malignant disease who had undergone a colostomy than in those who had had an ileostomy (OR 5·05, 2·28 to 11·23).ConclusionIncisional hernia of the previous stoma site was common and frequently required surgical correction. Higher BMI, reversal of colostomy in patients with an underlying malignancy, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia and hypertension were identified as independent risk factors.
“…The effects of hypertension on wound healing are less clear; possibly chronic microvascular changes secondary to hypertension could impair adequate tissue perfusion, thereby reducing proper wound healing and contributing to possible wound dehiscence. It is likely that other factors identified in previous studies, such as diabetes mellitus and wound infection, are also independent risk factors for hernia development. The low incidence of these factors in the present study might explain why they were not identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Several previous studies have looked at possible risk factors for incisional hernia following stoma reversal. High BMI and having a temporary colostomy were identified as significant risk factors in several of these studies , . Parastomal hernia, stoma prolapse and hypertension have not been identified previously; most of these factors were not included in other studies.…”
BackgroundStoma reversal is often considered a straightforward procedure with low short‐term complication rates. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of incisional hernia following stoma reversal and identify risk factors for its development.MethodsThis was an observational study of consecutive patients who underwent stoma reversal between 2009 and 2015 at a teaching hospital. Patients followed for at least 12 months were eligible. The primary outcome was the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. Independent risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsAfter a median follow‐up of 24 (range 12–89) months, 110 of 318 included patients (34·6 per cent) developed an incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In 85 (77·3 per cent) the hernia was symptomatic, and 72 patients (65·5 per cent) underwent surgical correction. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR) 1·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·21), stoma prolapse (OR 3·27, 1·04 to 10·27), parastomal hernia (OR 5·08, 1·30 to 19·85) and hypertension (OR 2·52, 1·14 to 5·54) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In addition, the risk of incisional hernia was greater in patients with underlying malignant disease who had undergone a colostomy than in those who had had an ileostomy (OR 5·05, 2·28 to 11·23).ConclusionIncisional hernia of the previous stoma site was common and frequently required surgical correction. Higher BMI, reversal of colostomy in patients with an underlying malignancy, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia and hypertension were identified as independent risk factors.
“…The reasons for the large variations may be multifactorial. Many of the studies include both small and large bowel ostomies [11,12,[15][16][17]. Hernias may be more common after reversal of large bowel ostomies principally because of the larger size of the abdominal wall defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High BMI and male sex were significant risk factors in this study. BMI has been shown to be a risk factor in many other studies [12,13,17,18] and is a factor to consider when choosing a technique for the reversal of the ostomy. Other studies have found female sex to be a risk factor for recurrence after incisional hernia repair [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of stoma site hernia has been reported between 9.6% and 34.6% [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] (Appendix Table 5). Differences may be explained by mixed populations with both colostomies and ileostomies [11,12,[15][16][17], and different methods for diagnosis, either computer tomography (CT) scan alone [13,19] or combined with patient evaluation [17,20]. Some previous studies have few patients [11,14] or use old surgical techniques [14].…”
Purpose To estimate the incidence of and risk factors for stoma site hernia after closure of a temporary diverting ileostomy. Method In a non-comparative cohort study, charts (n = 216) and CT-scans (n = 169) from patients who had undergone loop ileostomy closure following low anterior resection for rectal cancer 2010-2015 (mainly open surgery) at three hospitals were evaluated retrospectively. Patients without hernia diagnosis were evaluated cross-sectionally through a questionnaire (n = 158), and patients with symptoms of bulging or pain were contacted and offered a clinical examination or a CT scan including Valsalva maneuver. Results In the chart review, five (2.3%) patients had a diagnosis of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site after 8 months (median). In 12 patients, the CT scan showed a hernia, of which 8 had not been detected previously. The questionnaire was returned by 130 (82%) patients, of which 31% had symptoms of bulging or pain. Less than one in five of patients who reported bulging were diagnosed with hernia, but the absolute majority of the radiologically diagnosed hernias reported symptoms. By combining clinical and radiological diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of hernia was 7.4% during a median follow up time of 30 months. Risk factors for stoma site hernia were male sex and higher BMI. Conclusion Hernia at the previous stoma site was underdiagnosed. Less than a third of symptomatic patients had a hernia diagnosis in routine follow up. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate if prophylactic mesh can be used to prevent hernias, especially in patients with risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.