Incidence of moisture-associated skin damage in an intensive care unit

Valls-Matarín, J.; Cotillo-Fuente, M. del; Ribal-Prior, R.; Pujol-Vila, M.; Sandalinas-Mulero, I.

doi:10.1016/j.enfie.2017.03.005

Cited by 18 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients with double incontinence accounted for 12.8% of the study population. The incidence of IAD was 23.9%, which is consistent with the results of Valls‐Matarin, Del, Ribal‐Prior, Pujol‐Vila, and Sandalinas‐Mulero (), but lower (35.5%, 16/45) than those of Bliss et al. (), probably due to the limitation of samples as their subjects were mostly Caucasians.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Incidence and risk factors of incontinence‐associated dermatitis among patients in the intensive care unit

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Incidence and risk factors of incontinence‐associated dermatitis among patients in the intensive care unit

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21 Third, the prevalence of ST 2.0% (95% CI 1.62-2.40) in medical staff was higher than 1.06% in patients in a multicenter study, 14 but significantly lower than 22% elderly patients in a systematic review. 22 Fourth, the susceptible parts of skin injuries in medical staff were on the nose bridge, cheeks, ears, and forehead (Table 1), and in patients, DRPI mainly located on ears and feet, 10,23 MASD occurred on skin fold, periwounds, or peristoma, [19][20][21][22]24,25 and ST occurred on extremities. 14,22 The reasons possibly were as follows.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prevention Status of Skin Injury Caused by Personal Protective Equipment Among Medical Staff in Fighting COVID-19: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study

Jiang

Song

Zhou

et al. 2020

Advances in Wound Care

141

235

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and preventive status of skin injuries caused by personal protective equipment (PPE) in medical staff. Approach: A cross-sectional survey was conducted online for understanding skin injuries among medical staff fighting COVID-19 in February 8-22, 2020. Participants voluntarily answered and submitted the questionnaire with cell phone. The questionnaire items included demographic data, grade of PPE and daily wearing time, skin injury types, anatomical sites, and preventive measures. Univariable analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to explore the risk factors associated with skin injuries. Results: A total of 4,308 respondents were collected from 161 hospitals and 4,306 respondents were valid. The overall prevalence of skin injuries was 42.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.30-44.30) with three types of devicerelated pressure injuries, moist-associated skin damage, and skin tear. Co-skin injuries and multiple location injuries were 27.4% and 76.8%, respectively. The logistic regression analysis indicated that sweating (95% CI for odds ratio [OR] 87.52-163.11), daily wearing time (95% CI for OR 1.61-3.21), male (95% CI for OR 1.11-2.13), and grade 3 PPE (95% CI for OR 1.08-2.01) were associated with skin injuries. Only 17.7% of respondents took prevention and 45.0% of skin injuries were treated. Innovation: This is the first cross-sectional survey to understand skin injuries in medical staff caused by PPE, which is expected to be a benchmark. Conclusion: The skin injuries among medical staff are serious, with insufficient prevention and treatment. A comprehensive program should be taken in the future.

show abstract

“…Foram analisados 8 artigos científicos [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , dos quais 7(87,5%) foram encontrados em revistas internacionais [12][13][14][15][17][18][19] e 1(12,5%) em revista nacional 16 . Quanto à abordagem da revista, 4(50,0%) foram publicados em revistas específicas da Enfermagem 15-18 , 3(37,5%) em revistas que abordam sobre feridas e cuidados com a pele 12,13,19 e 1(12,5%) em revista médica 14 .…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Com relação às bases de dados nas quais os artigos foram capturados, identificou-se 6(75,0%) na BVS [13][14][15][16][17][18] que apresentou maior quantidade de artigos indexados, seguidos por 1(12,5%) na Scopus 19 e 1(12,5%) na PubMed 12 .…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Dificuldades e limitações na avaliação de lesão por pressão

Rodrigues¹,

Oliveira²,

Apratto³

et al. 2021

Revista Recien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo do presente estudo foi identificar na literatura científica as dificuldades e limitações dos enfermeiros na avaliação de lesões por pressão. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa abrangendo os anos de 2016 a 2020, com busca nas bases de dados Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed e Cinahl. Para a realização da busca, utilizaram-se os descritores pressure ulcer, nursing assessment, clinical competence e quality of health care. 8 artigos compuseram a amostra, predominando periódicos europeus e escritos na língua inglesa. As maiores dificuldades encontradas foram em relação à prevenção, risco, estadiamento, avaliação, descrição da ferida e ao uso de escalas e implantação de diretrizes na prática clínica. O estudo permitiu identificar a existência de dificuldades e limitações do enfermeiro na realização da avaliação de lesão por pressão, mostrando a necessidade de investimento em fontes de atualização profissional.Descritores: Lesão por Pressão, Avaliação em Enfermagem, Competência Clínica, Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde. Difficulties and limitations in assessing pressure injuryAbstract: The aim of the present study was to identify the difficulties and limitations of nurses in the evaluation of pressure injuries in the scientific literature. This is an integrative review covering the years 2016 to 2020, with a search in the Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Cinahl databases. To perform the search, the keywords pressure ulcer, nursing assessment, clinical competence and quality of health care were used. 8 articles made up the sample, predominantly European journals and written in the English language. The greatest difficulties encountered were in relation to prevention, risk, staging, evaluation, description of the wound and the use of scales and implementation of guidelines in clinical practice. The study made it possible to identify the existence of difficulties and limitations of nurses in carrying out the evaluation of pressure injuries, showing the need for investment in professional updating sources.Descriptors: Pressure Injury, Nursing Assessment, Clinical Competence, Quality of Health Care. Dificultades y limitaciones en la evaluación de las lesiones por presiónResumen: El objetivo del presente estudio fue identificar las dificultades y limitaciones del enfermero en la evaluación de las lesiones por presión en la literatura científica. Se trata de una revisión integradora que cubre los años 2016 a 2020, con una búsqueda en las bases de datos Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed y Cinahl. Para realizar la búsqueda se utilizaron las palabras clave úlcera por presión, valoración de enfermería, competencia clínica y calidad de la asistencia sanitaria. 8 artículos componen la muestra, predominantemente revistas europeas y escritos en lengua inglesa. Las mayores dificultades encontradas fueron en relación a la prevención, riesgo, estadificación, evaluación, descripción de la herida y uso de escalas e implementación de guías en la práctica clínica. El estudio permitió identificar la existencia de dificultades y limitaciones de los enfermeros para realizar la evaluación de las lesiones por presión, evidenciando la necesidad de invertir en fuentes de actualización profesional.Descriptores: Lesión por Presión, Evaluación de Enfermería, Competencia Clínica, Calidad de la Atención de Salud.

show abstract

Incidence of moisture-associated skin damage in an intensive care unit

Cited by 18 publications

References 21 publications

Incidence and risk factors of incontinence‐associated dermatitis among patients in the intensive care unit

Incidence and risk factors of incontinence‐associated dermatitis among patients in the intensive care unit

The Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prevention Status of Skin Injury Caused by Personal Protective Equipment Among Medical Staff in Fighting COVID-19: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study

Dificuldades e limitações na avaliação de lesão por pressão

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About