2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with provoked and unprovoked venous thromboembolism: Findings from the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad Tromboembólica Registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort there were no differences in the risk of ATE between patients with unprovoked VTE versus provoked VTE. This finding, though based on a relatively small number of patients, was contrary to our expectations, because several studies, including its meta-analysis, have shown that patients after unprovoked VTE were at higher risk of ATE compared to those with provoked VTE, however some reports failed to observe such differences related to the type of VTE 4 , 6 , 44 . Of note, we observed an increased fibrinogen concentration at 3 months since the event in patients with provoked VTE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In our cohort there were no differences in the risk of ATE between patients with unprovoked VTE versus provoked VTE. This finding, though based on a relatively small number of patients, was contrary to our expectations, because several studies, including its meta-analysis, have shown that patients after unprovoked VTE were at higher risk of ATE compared to those with provoked VTE, however some reports failed to observe such differences related to the type of VTE 4 , 6 , 44 . Of note, we observed an increased fibrinogen concentration at 3 months since the event in patients with provoked VTE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that patients with VTE and cancer have an increased risk of MACEs, which appears to be a major cause of mortality in patients with CAT. [30][31][32] These findings suggest that the influence of arterial ischemic events on clinical outcomes in patients with CAT needs to be elucidated. AEs reported in the COSIMO study were mostly cancer-or cancer therapyassociated events and were similar to those observed in the RCTs of DOACs in patients with CAT.…”
Section: All-cause Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Кумулятивная частота повторных тромботических событий, увеличивающих риск летального исхода и формирования посттромботической болезни, достигает 25-45% через 5-10 лет наблюдения [5][6][7][8]. Таким образом, рецидивирующие ВТЭО наряду с увеличенным риском поражения артериального русла и повышенной вероятностью наличия фонового злокачественного новообразования определяют снижение общей продолжительности жизни после перенесенного тромбоза [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Летальный исход в течение 8 лет настигает 35% и 65% больных, перенесших ТГВ и ТЭЛА соответственно, что значительно превышает аналогичный скорректированный по возрасту и полу показатель в общей популяции [9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified