1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1982.tb05276.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Local Recurrence After Curative Operations for Cancer of the Rectum1

Abstract: CARCINOMA OF RECTUM CHAPUIS ET ALll 12 GEHAN EA Ageneralised Wilcoxon Test for comparing arbitarily 13 PENFOLD JCB A comparison of restorative resection o f , single-censored samples 61ornetnka 1965 52 203-223 carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum with 18 abdominoperineal excision AuST NZ J SURG 1974, 14 MAYO CW FLY OA Analysis of five year survival In carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Surg Gynecol Obstet 1956 103 94-1 00 anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Surg Gynecol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between rates may be due to case mix 2,3 , surgical expertise 3±5 , differences in de®nition of local recurrence (pelvic only versus pelvic recurrence in the presence of metastatic disease) 6±8 , incomplete reporting of histopathological ®ndings 9 , lack of clarity in the de®nition of a curative operation 10 , variability in the protocol for and length of follow-up 6,11 , variability in data collection 12 and variability in the way in which local recurrence rates are calculated 8,13 . Furthermore, there have been few convincing studies of patient and tumour characteristics that might reliably predict local recurrence 14,15 . Such a study would require a large prospective patient cohort treated by standardized surgery alone, followed over a period of time suf®ciently long for most local recurrences to occur, and would include a comprehensive range of clinical variables with standardized pathology and staging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between rates may be due to case mix 2,3 , surgical expertise 3±5 , differences in de®nition of local recurrence (pelvic only versus pelvic recurrence in the presence of metastatic disease) 6±8 , incomplete reporting of histopathological ®ndings 9 , lack of clarity in the de®nition of a curative operation 10 , variability in the protocol for and length of follow-up 6,11 , variability in data collection 12 and variability in the way in which local recurrence rates are calculated 8,13 . Furthermore, there have been few convincing studies of patient and tumour characteristics that might reliably predict local recurrence 14,15 . Such a study would require a large prospective patient cohort treated by standardized surgery alone, followed over a period of time suf®ciently long for most local recurrences to occur, and would include a comprehensive range of clinical variables with standardized pathology and staging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of the safety of sphincter-saving resections for low rectal cancer remains somewhat troublesome. The British Large Bowel Cancer Project [9] found a higher local recurrence rate (18%) after anterior resection, than after abdominoperineal resection (12%, P < 0.02), as did the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-01 [19], whereas many other, smaller studies [5,13,15,20,21] have found no significant difference in local failure rates between the two procedures.…”
Section: Surgical Technique and Local Recurrencementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Without doubt, lymph node involvement and full thickness penetration of the muscular wall of the rectum are the most influential factors; thus risk increases significantly with advancing T or N stage [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. While other pathologic features of the primary tumor have been implicated (including microvascular and perineural invasion [12], tumor grade, and morphology [15]), their importance is overshadowed by depth of invasion and nodal status.…”
Section: Incidence and Predictors Of Local Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that local recurrence rates are related to Dukes' stage of the cancer, 9,[12][13][14][15] tumour grade, 12,[15][16][17] tumour distance from the anal verge, 12,15 inadequate distal 18 and circumferential margins, [19][20][21][22] and the use of adjuvant radiotherapy [23][24][25][26] as well as surgical technique. 13,27 Because this study is Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%