Incidence of Intravascular Penetration in Transforaminal Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN A prospective, observational, human, study was conducted. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence of vascular penetration during fluoroscopically guided, contrast-enhanced transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections, and to determine whether the observation of blood in the needle hub can be used to predict a vascular injection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Incorrectly placed intravascular cervical spinal injections result in medication flow systemically and not to the desired target. A recently published study demonstrates a high incidence of intravascular injections in transforaminal lumbosacral epidural injections. No studies so far have evaluated the incidence of vascular injections in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections, nor have they calculated the ability of observed blood in the needle hub to predict a vascular injection in the cervical spine.METHODS The incidence of fluoroscopically confirmed intravascular uptake of contrast was prospectively observed in 337 patients treated with cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. The ability of observed blood in the needle hub to predict intravascular injection was also investigated. For each subject, the injection level was chosen on the basis of the clinical scenario including history, physical examination, and review of imaging studies. Some patients had multilevel injections. Using fluoroscopic guidance, the authors placed a 25-gauge needle into the epidural space using a transforaminal approach according to accepted standard technique. Needle tip location was confirmed with biplanar imaging. The presence or absence of blood in the needle hub spontaneously ("flash") and after attempted aspiration by pulling back on the syringe's plunger was documented. Contrast then was injected under real-time fluoroscopy to determine whether the location of the needle tip was intravascular. The results were recorded in a prospective manner indicating the presence or absence of blood in the needle hub and whether a vascular pattern was noted with contrast injection, and these were correlated. Relevant epidemiologic data also were recorded. RESULTS The study included 504 transforaminal epidural steroid injections. The overall rate of fluoroscopically confirmed intravascular contrast injections was 19.4%. Use of observed blood in the needle hub to predict intravascular injections was 97% specific, but only 45.9% sensitive. There was no significant difference in intravascular rates related to age or gender. CONCLUSIONS As compared with a previous study of lumbosacral epidural steroid injections, there is an overall higher incidence of intravascular injections with cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Use of observed blood in the needle hub to predict an intravascular injection is not sensitive, and therefore the absence of blood in the needle hub despite aspiration is not reliable. The reported sensitivity and specificity rates are similar to lumbar data. Fluoroscopically guided procedures without contrast confirmation i...

Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy: effect and prognostic factors

“…In our experience, epidural steroid injection through a transforaminal approach occasionally causes nerve root puncture and pain provocation. Moreover, the risk of intravascular penetration in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection is higher than that for lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections [22][23][24][25]. However, no study has compared the clinical effects of the interlaminar and transforaminal approaches.…”

Selective diagnostic nerve root block for the evaluation of radicular pain in the multilevel degenerated cervical spine

“…However, the risks for damaging the nerve root, perforating the vertebral artery and intradural injection, when performing the root block, have to be borne in mind [7,9,23].…”

CT-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Steroid Injections: Where Should the Needle Tip Be Located?

“…The vascular injection rate in studies using conventional fluoroscopic guidance was as high as 20%. 8,12 There are no published data for the vascular injection rate with CT guidance, to our knowledge, but our study finds vascular injections to be uncommon with CT guidance because the carotid artery, vertebral artery, and jugular vein can be visualized on cross-sectional imaging and avoided. In contrast, conventional fluoroscopy only allows visualization of bony landmarks, which would explain a potentially higher intravascular injection rate.…”