2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of intramammary nodes in completion mastectomy specimens after axillary node sampling: Implications for breast conserving surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the situation where a patient has two ALNs involved and one IMLN involved, these patients will no longer be eligible. Furthermore, Rampaul et al () demonstrated the upstaging of a patient's final histology on the basis of IMLNs as discussed before.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Assuming the situation where a patient has two ALNs involved and one IMLN involved, these patients will no longer be eligible. Furthermore, Rampaul et al () demonstrated the upstaging of a patient's final histology on the basis of IMLNs as discussed before.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since the majority of the intra‐MLNs are located in the upper outer quadrant, they are most likely in the path of the lymphatic drainage to the axilla. Moreover, it has been reported that a fraction of the intra‐MLNs could be marked as SLN …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them are identified incidentally by imaging or by pathologic examination . Although the incidence has been reported to be up to 48%, other studies have shown this to occur only rarely . In one meta‐analysis that included 18 studies, the overall incidence was about 1% .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported diverse identification rates of iMLNs ranging from 0.2 to 48% [3,5,10,11,12,13,14]. This variability was caused by the use of different detection methods, including autopsy, pathologic review and retrospective chart review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%