1992
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199205000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this lack of data, we are unable to determine whether the increase was linear or nonlinear. This is especially important since the previous Colorado IDDM Registry showed no increase in incidence over the first 11 years of this analysis (1978 -1988) (17); however, the model that best fit these data are linear. Moreover, the estimated annual average increase was similar for the entire state of Colorado and for the Denver metropolitan area for which additional years of data collection were available (from 1996 to 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given this lack of data, we are unable to determine whether the increase was linear or nonlinear. This is especially important since the previous Colorado IDDM Registry showed no increase in incidence over the first 11 years of this analysis (1978 -1988) (17); however, the model that best fit these data are linear. Moreover, the estimated annual average increase was similar for the entire state of Colorado and for the Denver metropolitan area for which additional years of data collection were available (from 1996 to 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most populationbased registries have shown an increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes over time (2,4 -12), whereas others have shown no trend (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Some of the inconsistencies may be attributed to differences in ascertainment and inadequate sample size to detect statistically significant changes over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations