Abstract:Cardio kickboxing classes have become a popular form of exercise to enhance fitness. This study surveyed kickboxing participants and instructors to ascertain the severity, type, and incidence of injuries sustained while performing cardio kickboxing exercise. The respondents consisted of 77.4% instructors and 29.3% participants with a mean age of 32.29 years (+/-8.98 years). Injury from kickboxing exercise was reported by 29.3% of the respondents, 31% of the instructors, and 15.5% of the participants. The most … Show more
“…This is in accordance with previous findings among fitness instructors. (du Toit & Smith, 2001;Romaine et al, 2003) As previous studies have described injuries on the vocal cords and hearing among instructors, (Rumbach, 2013;Wilsont & Herbstein, 2003) it was somewhat surprising that very few instructors reported injury in the head region. One explanation for this might be underreporting of such injuries, and that specific questionnaires are necessary to detect this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Garrick et al, 1986) Another study presented prevalence numbers among aerobics instructors as high as 77% with the most frequent injury locations being leg, foot/ankle and knee. (du Toit & Smith, 2001) Romaine et al(2003) found that 31% of cardio kickboxing instructors had experienced injuries related to such classes, and reported back, knee, hip and shoulder as the most frequent injury locations. Among step aerobics instructors, 73.5% reported chronic lower extremity injuries, and among others working hours and instructor experience were factors explaining the injury prevalence (Malliou et al, 2014) Musculoskeletal pain is common among athletes (Foss, Holme, & Bahr, 2012;Jacobsson et al, 2012) and in the general population.…”
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Bratland-Sanda, S., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Myklebust, G. (2015 Research affiliation: Norwegian school of sport sciences, Oslo Norway.
Conflicts of interest and source of funding:The authors have no conflicts of interest. No funding was received for this study. and both acute and overuse injuries (25% vs 10%, p<0.001) was higher in the HIL than in the LIL group (OR: 3.9, CI: 2.7, 5.5). The most prevalent injury locations were ankle and lower leg. The most frequent location for musculoskeletal pain was the shoulder/neck region. Factors associated with injury were instruction loading (h/w), years working as an instructor and EDI score. A high total EDI score predicted musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion:The high prevalence of injuries and musculoskeletal pain suggests a need for prevention strategies in the fitness industry. There is a need for limits regarding weekly instruction loading, especially for classes with high metabolic and/or mechanical loading.3
“…This is in accordance with previous findings among fitness instructors. (du Toit & Smith, 2001;Romaine et al, 2003) As previous studies have described injuries on the vocal cords and hearing among instructors, (Rumbach, 2013;Wilsont & Herbstein, 2003) it was somewhat surprising that very few instructors reported injury in the head region. One explanation for this might be underreporting of such injuries, and that specific questionnaires are necessary to detect this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Garrick et al, 1986) Another study presented prevalence numbers among aerobics instructors as high as 77% with the most frequent injury locations being leg, foot/ankle and knee. (du Toit & Smith, 2001) Romaine et al(2003) found that 31% of cardio kickboxing instructors had experienced injuries related to such classes, and reported back, knee, hip and shoulder as the most frequent injury locations. Among step aerobics instructors, 73.5% reported chronic lower extremity injuries, and among others working hours and instructor experience were factors explaining the injury prevalence (Malliou et al, 2014) Musculoskeletal pain is common among athletes (Foss, Holme, & Bahr, 2012;Jacobsson et al, 2012) and in the general population.…”
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Bratland-Sanda, S., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Myklebust, G. (2015 Research affiliation: Norwegian school of sport sciences, Oslo Norway.
Conflicts of interest and source of funding:The authors have no conflicts of interest. No funding was received for this study. and both acute and overuse injuries (25% vs 10%, p<0.001) was higher in the HIL than in the LIL group (OR: 3.9, CI: 2.7, 5.5). The most prevalent injury locations were ankle and lower leg. The most frequent location for musculoskeletal pain was the shoulder/neck region. Factors associated with injury were instruction loading (h/w), years working as an instructor and EDI score. A high total EDI score predicted musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion:The high prevalence of injuries and musculoskeletal pain suggests a need for prevention strategies in the fitness industry. There is a need for limits regarding weekly instruction loading, especially for classes with high metabolic and/or mechanical loading.3
“…The latter authors also reported that Australian kickboxers sustained more head injuries than those from the United Kingdom and Holland (51.6% vs. 42.5%), but fewer lower extremity injuries (39.8% vs. 53.4%, respectively). Romaine et al [28] stated that the most common sites of injury for kickboxers were the back, the knee, and the ankle; the most common types of injuries were strains followed by sprains, and tendinitis. Professional fighters were 2.5 times more likely to get injured compared with amateurs (rate ratio, 2.51), while defeated fighters were 3.5 times more likely to get injured compared with winners (rate ratio, 3.48) [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a therapeutic point of view, limiting the number of kickboxing sessions per week may help to reduce injury rates [28], and the coach should adapt specific training/competition contests for young and children kickboxers (e.g., light contact kickboxing in both simulated and official combats) by avoiding a full-contact kickboxing competition.…”
Kickboxing is one of the modern combat sports. The psychophysiological demands of a kickboxing competition require athletes to achieve high thresholds of several aspects of physical fitness. The aim of the current review is to critically analyse and appraise the kickboxer’s anthropometric, physiological, physical and psychological attributes with the activity profile and injury epidemiology in order to provide practical recommendations for training as well as new areas of scientific research. The available information shows that both amateur and elite-level male kickboxers are characterized by a higher proportion of mesomorphy with a well-developed muscle mass and low body fat percentage. While there is some variation in the maximum oxygen uptake of kickboxers, moderate to high cardio-respiratory levels are reported for these athletes. Regardless of kickboxers’ level, a high peak and mean anaerobic power output were reported. High-level kickboxing performance also requires well-developed muscle power in both the upper and lower limbs. Psychological factors contribute to success that requires high levels of self-confidence, motivation, dispositional hope and optimism, mental toughness/resiliency, and adaptive perfectionism. Psychological attributes also distinguished successful from less successful kickboxers. The activity-to-rest ratio was higher in elite (1:1) than both amateur and national-level (from 1:2 to 1:5) kickboxers, with no significant differences between rounds (round 1=1:4, and rounds 2 and 3=1:5) as well as between winners and losers in amateur and national-level simulated combats. These particular psychophysiological characteristics and performance aspects of kickboxers influence performance and could serve as guidance for training. Finally, kickboxing is characterized by chronic repetitive head trauma, which causes hypopituitarism due to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Future investigations into the physical, physiological and psychological characteristics related to age, gender and competitive levels of kickboxers are required to enrich the current knowledge and to help create the most suitable training programme.
“…In comparison with other martial arts, contusions are the most common type of injury in karate [2] and taekwondo [27]. Muscle strains are also common, not only in judo but also in kickboxing [34]. Muscle strains might be incurred due to repeated body collisions during attack and defence manoeuvers.…”
SummaryStudy aim: The aim of this study was twofold: first, to compare the incidence of injuries between male and female athletes in the junior and youth divisions during competition, as well as to identify body parts commonly injured and the types of injury frequently incurred; second, to assess overall incidence of injuries in relation to the frequency and duration of training as well as supplemental training. Material and methods: Subjects were Filipino judokas (n = 192) competing in 4 major divisions at a national competition in Manila in 2009. Injury rates are expressed per 1,000 athlete-exposures, and the confidence intervals around the rates were computed.Results: There was no difference in injury rate between boys (84.03/1,000 athlete-exposures (A-E), 95% CI: 47.20-120.86) and girls (37.04/1,000 A-E, 95% CI: -14.29-88.37). Although the boys were at a higher risk than the girls, the difference was not significant (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 0.62-15.76). The junior women were at a higher risk than the girls (OR = 6.30, 95% CI: 1.26-31.66). Neither training frequencies of ≤2, 3, and ≥4 sessions per week nor training durations of ≤2 and >2 hours were significant predictors of injury. Supplemental training was not found to be related to the occurrence of injuries. Conclusion: Judo is a relatively safe physical activity for young adults and children. Training variables, such as frequency and duration, and supplemental training do not influence the occurence of injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.