2016
DOI: 10.1016/s2222-1808(16)61098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs presented at University of Nigeria, Nsukka Veterinary Teaching Hospital using wet smear and buffy coat techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also higher prevalence rate of positive cases in older dogs than in young ones. This agrees with previous reports by Ugochukwu et al (2016) and Ogbaje and Abel-Danjuma (2016), who all reported higher prevalence rates of infection in older, male and outdoor dogs. This may likely be attributable to the long incubation period of the worm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There was also higher prevalence rate of positive cases in older dogs than in young ones. This agrees with previous reports by Ugochukwu et al (2016) and Ogbaje and Abel-Danjuma (2016), who all reported higher prevalence rates of infection in older, male and outdoor dogs. This may likely be attributable to the long incubation period of the worm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Canine dirofilariasis, also called heartworm disease, is a non-contagious, parasitic disease caused by a filarial/small thread-like worm, Dirofilaria immitis of the family Onchocercidae [20]. The parasite is one of the most pathogenic nematodes distributed worldwide, primarily affecting dogs and cats [34]. Mosquitoes (Aedes, Culex, Anopheles species) are the vectors which transmit this parasite from host to host [18].…”
Section: Etiology and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the prevalence of D. immitis in dogs ranged from 17% to 28% in Korea (Lee et al, 1996), from 2.5% to 33.3% in Mexico (González-Morteo, 2015), it is 1.0% in South Australia (Copland et al, 1992), 5.5% in Brazil (Reifur et al, 2004), 19.0% in Spain (Montoya-Alonso et al, 2010, 20.9% in South Korea (Song et al, 2010), and 30.8% in South Africa (Schwand & Durand, 2002). The prevalence of dog dirofilariasis in Nigeria ranged from 2.1% to 4.8% (Ogbaje & Danjuma, 2016;Ugochukwu et al, 2016;Ezema et al, 2019). This analysis provides a sufficiently high and specific sensitivity for accurate generic identification of heartworms, including D. immitis (Albonico et al, 2014;Borthakur et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%