2018
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of cesarean section among primi at a tertiary care hospital in Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India

Abstract: Background: Not only in India but globally the incidence of cesarean section deliveries is increasing and it is becoming an important cause of concern. The objective of the present study was to observe the incidence of cesarean section deliveries at a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A hospital record-based study was carried out from January 2017 to August 2018. All deliveries with live birth taking place among the primipara were included in the present study. Other than this was excluded. Data was analyzed usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study (10) conducted by Anu Bala Chandel et al the primary cesarean (11) rate was calculated as 74.38%, and by Saha et al showed 74.34%, which is greater than the present study. The study (12) done by Janaki Vellanki showed 35.6%, which is lower than our study, as the study was done at a government hospital with a sample size of 12554 primiparous women; and also, the study didn't mention the details of medically indicated cesareans and cesarean done for labor dystocia were not mentioned which could probably contribute to low rate compared to our study. Ours is a tertiary care center and one of the most referred centers with a well-established high-risk pregnancy unit and competent neonatal and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) facilities; the cesarean rates were high, as reflected in our study.…”
Section: Original Articlecontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In a study (10) conducted by Anu Bala Chandel et al the primary cesarean (11) rate was calculated as 74.38%, and by Saha et al showed 74.34%, which is greater than the present study. The study (12) done by Janaki Vellanki showed 35.6%, which is lower than our study, as the study was done at a government hospital with a sample size of 12554 primiparous women; and also, the study didn't mention the details of medically indicated cesareans and cesarean done for labor dystocia were not mentioned which could probably contribute to low rate compared to our study. Ours is a tertiary care center and one of the most referred centers with a well-established high-risk pregnancy unit and competent neonatal and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) facilities; the cesarean rates were high, as reflected in our study.…”
Section: Original Articlecontrasting
confidence: 85%