1996
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530360023033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of and Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
197
1
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
197
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Ernster et al (1996) found that the proportion of patients with DCIS who were treated with mastectomy decreased from 71% in 1983 to 44% in 1992 (Ernster et al, 1996). The authors also noted that 44% of the patients in 1992 who underwent lumpectomy received RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ernster et al (1996) found that the proportion of patients with DCIS who were treated with mastectomy decreased from 71% in 1983 to 44% in 1992 (Ernster et al, 1996). The authors also noted that 44% of the patients in 1992 who underwent lumpectomy received RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the technological advances in detecting these lesions, their biological significance and natural history are not well understood. Five percent to 10% of women diagnosed with DCIS who are treated with lumpectomy alone develop invasive cancer within 5 years and a similar group develops subsequent DCIS (5). Although adjuvant treatment with radiation and tamoxifen has reduced the rates of subsequent breast cancer, these treatment regimens have not affected death rates from breast cancer (6,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although established markers of tumour behaviour, including tumour size and nodal status are applicable for this group of patients, tissue-based markers that can predict the risk of progression and recurrence would improve the ability to identify those who would benefit from the treatment (Bennington et al, 1992;Ernster et al, 1996;Tabar et al, 2000). Indeed, several such markers, such as tumour grade and estrogen receptor (ER) status are well established.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%