2018
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1504956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of allergic reactions to Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in other studies, limited interventions beyond stopping the infusion and restarting at a slower rate along with antihistamines were necessary to address these reactions. [7][8][9][10][13][14][15] No patients in our analysis were known to have developed a delayed hypersensitivity, or serum sickness, reaction. This differs from the rates observed in previously published postmarketing studies examining F(ab')₂AV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like in other studies, limited interventions beyond stopping the infusion and restarting at a slower rate along with antihistamines were necessary to address these reactions. [7][8][9][10][13][14][15] No patients in our analysis were known to have developed a delayed hypersensitivity, or serum sickness, reaction. This differs from the rates observed in previously published postmarketing studies examining F(ab')₂AV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although cases of rate-dependent hypersensitivity have not been specifically published for F(ab')₂AV, rate-dependent acute hypersensitivity reactions are a known feature of antibody-based therapies generally and are well described with FabAV. [13][14][15] A history of asthma was considered a risk factor for acute hypersensitivity reactions with prior crotalid antivenoms, although it is unknown whether this is the case for F(ab')₂AV. 16 The frequency of acute hypersensitivity reactions (7.7%) is similar to what has been described in prior literature and is likely magnified by our small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our most important observation was the confirmation of a high rate of AEs related to antivenoms: almost half of the patients (22/47, 47%) presented with IRRs, a manifestation compatible with the type I hypersensitivity reaction. This early reaction is possibly mediated by previously formed IgE antibodies, whose binding with heterologous serum proteins promote the release of vasoactive mediators and the typical clinical manifestations of an allergic reaction (nasal and ocular congestion, nasal obstruction, wheezing, urticaria, angiedema, anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock) 12 , 15 , 23 , 24 . A postulated alternative mechanism is also a variant form of the type I hypersensitivity reaction, the anaphylactoid reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely because copperhead envenomation patients rarely develop life-threatening systemic effects, such as hypotension, neurotoxicity, severe defibrinogenation, or severe thrombocytopenia [8][9][10][11]. Although the previous, equine-derived antivenom had serious problems with acute hypersensitivity reactions and serum sickness that restricted its use to more serious envenomation cases, FabAV is generally safe and well-tolerated [12][13][14][15]. However, antivenoms are expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%